ARCADE FIRE + SPRINGSTEEN - "Keep The Car Running"
#1
Posted 15 October 2007 - 02:35 PM
For the world.
That give worms to ex-girlfriends: [url="http://www.gigposter...tp://www.gigpos
#2
Posted 15 October 2007 - 02:40 PM


#3
Posted 15 October 2007 - 05:06 PM
www,twitter.com/ihatemattdrufke
www.facebook.com/mattdrufke
Listen to my album, This Is Supposed To Be Fun, on Spotify, or buy it on any of the major online music services.
#4
Posted 15 October 2007 - 05:11 PM
#5
Posted 15 October 2007 - 05:55 PM
#6
Posted 15 October 2007 - 07:44 PM

#7
Posted 15 October 2007 - 09:14 PM
#8
Posted 15 October 2007 - 11:35 PM
i'm not the biggest boss or arcade fire fan but i felt like the cameraman:
"holy shit!" i was giddy watching it.
yeah. me too. actually, scratch that, i think the boss is awesome, but i'm by no means a hardcore fan (although i do like pretty much all of his stuff that i've heard).
anyhow, that tune is basically a springsteen song in the first place, the boss' fans should have been thrilled.
my blog
my last.fm
#9
Posted 16 October 2007 - 12:21 PM
i'm not the biggest boss or arcade fire fan but i felt like the cameraman:
"holy shit!" i was giddy watching it.
yeah. me too. actually, scratch that, i think the boss is awesome, but i'm by no means a hardcore fan (although i do like pretty much all of his stuff that i've heard).
anyhow, that tune is basically a springsteen song in the first place, the boss' fans should have been thrilled.
I've been trying to see Springsteen since I was a kid. If I finally get to see him and he's covering some song from the Arcade Fire's sub-par second album? No offense, Arcade Fire, but fuck off and let me hear "Candy's Room" or "Backstreets".
#10
Posted 16 October 2007 - 12:29 PM
my blog
my last.fm
#11
Posted 16 October 2007 - 12:32 PM
a valid point, but still it seems like it was only about 10 minutes in what's usually a minimum 150 minute concert.
True. And it's a cool thing. I'm just playing Springsteen-fanboy-advocate. He's got a huge catalogue of songs and his shows cost a pretty penny. I'm sure some people in the crowd were thinking "well, there's one less Bruce song I get to hear tonight".
#12
Posted 16 October 2007 - 12:34 PM
#13
Posted 16 October 2007 - 12:35 PM
a valid point, but still it seems like it was only about 10 minutes in what's usually a minimum 150 minute concert.
True. And it's a cool thing. I'm just playing Springsteen-fanboy-advocate. He's got a huge catalogue of songs and his shows cost a pretty penny. I'm sure some people in the crowd were thinking "well, there's one less Bruce song I get to hear tonight".
I dunno...does one really start dividing price of a ticket to cost per song? I think it's more about the experience and if you've got an act that Canada is quite proud of right now, up there with Bruce and there's added electricity in the air. That's coming close to priceless.


#14
Posted 16 October 2007 - 12:36 PM
a valid point, but still it seems like it was only about 10 minutes in what's usually a minimum 150 minute concert.
True. And it's a cool thing. I'm just playing Springsteen-fanboy-advocate. He's got a huge catalogue of songs and his shows cost a pretty penny. I'm sure some people in the crowd were thinking "well, there's one less Bruce song I get to hear tonight".
and those fans can go fuck themselves.
so they miss one song? there is value & meaning in seeing older rockers collaborate with artists they have influenced.
#15
Posted 16 October 2007 - 12:36 PM
yes, this was from the bruce concert over the weekend in ottawa. i believe the video is all win and regine were there for.So I don't get it...was this a Bruce concert and AF just sat in for a couple of tunes? That's pretty cool...
#16
Posted 16 October 2007 - 12:53 PM
#17
Posted 16 October 2007 - 12:59 PM
a valid point, but still it seems like it was only about 10 minutes in what's usually a minimum 150 minute concert.
True. And it's a cool thing. I'm just playing Springsteen-fanboy-advocate. He's got a huge catalogue of songs and his shows cost a pretty penny. I'm sure some people in the crowd were thinking "well, there's one less Bruce song I get to hear tonight".
I dunno...does one really start dividing price of a ticket to cost per song? I think it's more about the experience and if you've got an act that Canada is quite proud of right now, up there with Bruce and there's added electricity in the air. That's coming close to priceless.
Yeah, it's probably a one-time thing, so if you were there - you're lucky to have been there. I don't think anyone divides the price of a ticket to cost per song. I'm just saying - if you're in that crowd and you paid $200 for your seat and you don't like the Arcade Fire, you might not be thrilled with it. Especially since they did an AF song.
#18
Posted 16 October 2007 - 01:02 PM
#19
Posted 16 October 2007 - 01:04 PM
Win & Bruce are on the December cover of SPIN together
ah ha


#20
Posted 16 October 2007 - 01:10 PM











