Obama: The Administration
#1
Posted 05 November 2008 - 03:05 PM
NBC reports Rahm Emanuel accepts the position.
"Chicago is...my kind of town...."
#2
Posted 05 November 2008 - 03:09 PM
#3
Posted 05 November 2008 - 03:13 PM
#4
Posted 05 November 2008 - 03:17 PM
Any word on the appointment of the puppy?
I'm looking for further details on vetting process (ha! Vet-ting), the short list, etc.Obama's campaign promise: a dog for his daughters
Posted by Deb Wood, special to The Oregonian November 05, 2008 08:18AM
When President-elect Obama spoke last night, he carefully lowered expectations. He talked about sacrifice and the big tasks ahead. He didn't promise anyone anything.
Except for one thing: He promised his daughters a dog.
People who don't follow the politics of dogs might not know how much fur flew over where the Obamas would get their pet. Should the dog be purebred or a shelter dog? It was settled when Michelle Obama said that the family would adopt a shelter dog.
I'm willing to bet that the Obamas make this decision with the same careful thought that typified the campaign. Reports are that there are some allergy issues in the family, so they're looking for a breed (or mix) that doesn't shed. I am sure they'll find a dog that loves kids.
If they find a great family dog at a shelter or rescue group -- and goodness knows those dogs are out there -- it might be a step forward for the dogs that are waiting for homes all across the country.
No matter what your politics may be, that would be a happy day.
Biden will not be the only one in the White House on a short leash.
Thank you folks, drive safely!
#5
Posted 05 November 2008 - 03:33 PM
#6
Posted 05 November 2008 - 03:35 PM
i'm glad that emanuel accepted. he's a complex man, a capable man, and there is something wonderfully symmetrical about obama's first appointment from a man with a muslim name going to a man with a hebrew one.
He's Ari Gold, he's a fucking lunatic.
#7
Posted 05 November 2008 - 03:40 PM
I'm looking for further details on vetting process (ha! Vet-ting), the short list, etc.
Biden will not be the only one in the White House on a short leash.
In the selection of his administrators, it certainly is true that those working under the President should not feel neutered under his power. They will need to be trained ...yet not be at his heels at every moment, and not bark loud responses out of spite when disagreeable to his orders. The worst thing that can happen would be for one of these selected persons to soil the Oval Office with issues that are repellant to making our country a great place to live, work and play.
"Is everyone on here just an act sometimes?"--Hummingbird
Read all of my stupid song parodies here. Latest song improved/ruined: "Barbara Ann" by The Beach Boys.
Download all of my alleged music free through the remainder of May at www.soundclick.com/agrimorfee
Also jabbering about music and movies at www.rateyourmusic.com
#8
Posted 05 November 2008 - 03:56 PM
#9
Posted 05 November 2008 - 03:58 PM
#10
Posted 05 November 2008 - 03:59 PM
#11
Posted 05 November 2008 - 04:02 PM
#12
Posted 05 November 2008 - 04:12 PM
Move to Delaware, your odds are better there.Any SOMBies out there have an inside track to be named Senator by Blogo to replace Obama? I think I'd make a great Senator.
#13
Posted 05 November 2008 - 04:15 PM
Any word on the appointment of the puppy?
I'm looking for further details on vetting process (ha! Vet-ting), the short list, etc.Obama's campaign promise: a dog for his daughters
Posted by Deb Wood, special to The Oregonian November 05, 2008 08:18AM
When President-elect Obama spoke last night, he carefully lowered expectations. He talked about sacrifice and the big tasks ahead. He didn't promise anyone anything.
Except for one thing: He promised his daughters a dog.
People who don't follow the politics of dogs might not know how much fur flew over where the Obamas would get their pet. Should the dog be purebred or a shelter dog? It was settled when Michelle Obama said that the family would adopt a shelter dog.
I'm willing to bet that the Obamas make this decision with the same careful thought that typified the campaign. Reports are that there are some allergy issues in the family, so they're looking for a breed (or mix) that doesn't shed. I am sure they'll find a dog that loves kids.
If they find a great family dog at a shelter or rescue group -- and goodness knows those dogs are out there -- it might be a step forward for the dogs that are waiting for homes all across the country.
No matter what your politics may be, that would be a happy day.
Biden will not be the only one in the White House on a short leash.
Thank you folks, drive safely!
#14
Posted 05 November 2008 - 04:16 PM
I'd be willing to take the train home on weekends and talk for 80% of my allotted time during conformation hearings.Move to Delaware, your odds are better there.Any SOMBies out there have an inside track to be named Senator by Blogo to replace Obama? I think I'd make a great Senator.
#15
Posted 05 November 2008 - 06:20 PM
#16
Posted 05 November 2008 - 07:40 PM
How so? Not disagreeing--my interesting in economic policy far outstrips my understanding of it, is all.volcker for treasury secretary would be OUTstanding.
#17
Posted 05 November 2008 - 07:56 PM
he's a practical guy, is all. we've gotten a few decades worth of 'let the market do as it may' monetary policy. not saying that greenspan, et al didn't treat us to years of unprecendented prosperity. but at what cost? volcker is a learned hand (from his first stint as fed chief, which was by almost every account an almost unqualified success) and not some egghead.How so? Not disagreeing--my interesting in economic policy far outstrips my understanding of it, is all.volcker for treasury secretary would be OUTstanding.
plus, he's someone whose likely to be palatable to the GOP as well (he's a right-leaning centrist politically), which has the benefit of insuring quick confirmation (important as we don't have a lot of time for dithering, BS) and is also symbolically valuable (obama reaching across the aisle to come up with a solution that's for the good of the order, rather than something that's just politically expedient/partisan).
#18
Posted 05 November 2008 - 08:11 PM
#19
Posted 05 November 2008 - 08:23 PM

#20
Posted 05 November 2008 - 08:27 PM
volcker for treasury secretary would be OUTstanding.
Agreed. I chuckled when I read this the other day. Its from the New York Times in June 3, 1987 - the day Volcker stepped down and Greenspan took over.
The main philosophical difference between Mr. Volcker, a Democrat, and Mr. Greenspan, a Republican, appears to be in their views of the structure and regulation of the banking system. Mr. Volcker has tended to resist deregulation of banks while Mr. Greenspan is more favorably disposed to it.
One of them was dead wrong.









