music I should probably like but don't
#1
Posted 29 January 2009 - 04:37 AM
Classic rap trio changed the world, but can they ever change my mind? Raising Hell just gets on my nerves. I realize this was years before De La Soul/Nas/Dr. Dre so I really shouldn't be expecting truly innovative production or lyrics, but there's just nothing here that appeals to me at all. Really all they have going for them is that they were still better than the Beastie Boys at this point.
2. Brian Eno - "Baby's on Fire"
By all accounts considering everything else I'm obsessed with I should love this guy but that's not happening so far. His ambient albums have never moved me like I've been promised they would, and his poppier releases, while probably being groundbreaking and everything, never did much for me either. This seems to be his most famous song, but despite its apparent subversiveness I've never liked it at all. The Superpitcher cover of it did little to change my very sound opinion.
3. Lee Hazelwood & Nancy Sinatra - "Some Velvet Morning"
I was streaming this on Last.fm at work one day and a coworker turned to me and asked "What is that?" Not just "What is that?" or "What is that?," but with verbal italics on every word. And I could understand where she was coming from. I like everything I've heard from both of these artists on their own. I love the Primal Scream cover of this song. The original is simply annoying. Maybe if I'd heard it in a Tarantino film when I was 16 I'd probably think it was some classic shit and forgive its countless flaws but as it stands I really don't understand why this is so highly rated. What a mess. I still believe I might come around to this one day but do I want to and what kind of person will I be then?
4. Pop Will Eat Itself
I guess you had to be there.
5. Terry Riley - In C
The feather in the cap of every true elite music listener, but try as I may, this just goes nowhere. Definitely not on the level of Steve Reich's Drumming or Music for 18 Musicians, or even Philip Glass's most uninspired throwaways.
6. REM - Murmur
I simply can't envision a world where this band was seen as truly "groundbreaking," but I guess it happened. There are a few good songs here but what an awful recording. Here's where someone tells me that I've gotta listen to the remastered version to truly appreciate it.
#2
Posted 29 January 2009 - 04:43 AM
6. REM - Murmur
I simply can't envision a world where this band was seen as truly "groundbreaking," but I guess it happened. There are a few good songs here but what an awful recording. Here's where someone tells me that I've gotta listen to the remastered version to truly appreciate it.
this opinion is groundbreakingly OTM.
obviously "Radio Free Europe" is a monster jam, and the next few songs after it are pretty cool, but an especially noteworthy record it is not.
#3
Posted 29 January 2009 - 04:50 AM
#4
Posted 29 January 2009 - 08:46 AM
4. Pop Will Eat Itself
I guess you had to be there.
i was a student in birmingham in the late 80's when they broke so i guess i was there, they were the closest thing the midlands had to the beastie boys!
however i have only kept wise up! sucker, can u dig it? dance of the mad, cicciolina, bulletproof!, def. con. one & pwiesation on my ipod & these dont get regular listening, though listening to def. con. one & can u dig it? bring back very fond memories of student nights at local night clubs from back then and i can't see myself ever deleting those two tracks
#5
Posted 29 January 2009 - 09:02 AM
"Is everyone on here just an act sometimes?"--Hummingbird
Read all of my stupid song parodies here. Latest song improved/ruined: "Barbara Ann" by The Beach Boys.
Download all of my alleged music free through the remainder of May at www.soundclick.com/agrimorfee
Also jabbering about music and movies at www.rateyourmusic.com
#6
Posted 29 January 2009 - 09:52 AM
6. REM - Murmur
I simply can't envision a world where this band was seen as truly "groundbreaking," but I guess it happened. There are a few good songs here but what an awful recording. Here's where someone tells me that I've gotta listen to the remastered version to truly appreciate it.
this opinion is groundbreakingly OTM.
Not really. I remember a number of people on here (Hickman, Good Dr. Bill, BobtheSquid) saying they just don't get Murmur or saying they like it, but don't think it's a masterpiece.
For me, it's their most unique recording. The songs seem to fit together like pieces in a jigsaw puzzle. I don't really care if it was groundbreaking or if it ushered in "college rock" or whatever, I just love the songs on it ("Radio Free Europe," "Perfect Circle," "Talk About the Passion," "Pilgrimage," "Shaking Through," and "Moral Kiosk" are all great, IMO). I did buy the Murmur Deluxe Edition and I think it's great (because it sounds more dynamic than the original), though if those who don't think it's great don't like the songs, I don't see how getting the remastered version will change anything. I listened to Murmur a week ago and was surprised that some of the lyrics clicked for me in a way they never had before. I remember thinking, Damn, I love this album!
#7
Posted 29 January 2009 - 12:19 PM
#8
Posted 29 January 2009 - 12:34 PM
#9
Posted 29 January 2009 - 01:02 PM
Kiss me till I'm in a coma:
Hug me, honey, snuggly bunny;
Love's as good as soma.
#10
Posted 29 January 2009 - 01:11 PM
#11
Posted 29 January 2009 - 01:14 PM
#12
Posted 29 January 2009 - 01:16 PM
HTTP://WWW.VIRB.COM/MAXFRECKA
shitty synths and drum sounds put together to form something I hope is new
#13
Posted 29 January 2009 - 01:34 PM
See, this doesn't compute. One of the things that always mystified me was the Zappa fan who was not a Beefheart fan. How much of it have you heard?Captain Beefheart
BTW, I can't stand the fucking Eagles. But you know that.
Not big on U2. Any of it. I was there for all that stuff, and it never did a thing for me.
#14
Posted 29 January 2009 - 01:48 PM
#16
Posted 29 January 2009 - 02:03 PM
#17
Posted 29 January 2009 - 02:29 PM
i love zappa's whole career, but so much of it is straightforward pop/rock, he just throws in "wacky, dirty" lyrics and unexpected prog breaks and stuff. it's so tight and composed and focused on musical perfection.See, this doesn't compute. One of the things that always mystified me was the Zappa fan who was not a Beefheart fan. How much of it have you heard?Captain Beefheart
whereas beefheart is raw, from the gut stuff, with focus on the idea of being a "non musician." the captain was punk fucking rock.
some zappa fans don't "get" beefheart, and some beefheart fans find zappa to be too sterile w/ too much focus on constantly imposing his pompous "composer" rep and "bitingly cynical worldview" on the listener.
very possible to like one and not the other. if you're somebody who thinks you have "weird" taste and wonder why you don't like beefheart, your taste probably isn't that weird anyway
#18
Posted 29 January 2009 - 02:39 PM
#19
Posted 29 January 2009 - 02:47 PM
completely disliking a genre is utterly lame
Stick with what you like. Who cares? I feel the same way about hip hop: the cadence, the emphasis on beats, the rhyming, the posturing, none of it appeals to me regardless where it's coming from.
#20
Posted 29 January 2009 - 02:48 PM


This topic is locked









