Is it a post-lyrics musical era we're in?
#1
Posted 03 March 2009 - 11:34 PM
#2
Posted 03 March 2009 - 11:36 PM
Nah.Or does it matter?

Damo Suzuki: So, um, yeah. Getting older isn't as bad as it sounds. Better than being young & poor (DjDrake) or young & slutty (SG) or young, poor and slutty (Paves); am I right?
Alright, my friends. It's time for another solid little rock jam
#3
Posted 03 March 2009 - 11:46 PM
Sun Kil Moon's April had fantastic lyrics. The style Mark Kozelek is working in demands it, however. Not so for, say, Vivian Girls.
We're certainly not living in a post lyrics society. Bands today are just informed by a wider array of influences than ones in the '60s. They know that music can be just as engaging from a standpoint that is more sonically based.

Damo Suzuki: So, um, yeah. Getting older isn't as bad as it sounds. Better than being young & poor (DjDrake) or young & slutty (SG) or young, poor and slutty (Paves); am I right?
Alright, my friends. It's time for another solid little rock jam
#5
Posted 04 March 2009 - 12:00 AM
#6
Posted 04 March 2009 - 12:12 AM
my blog
my last.fm
#7
Posted 04 March 2009 - 01:21 AM
How many of the acclaimed non-hip-hop albums of the last few years can you think of that have great lyrics? Of 2008's P4k top 20, around half had either no words, nearly unintelligible words, or words that were merely fluff for electronic beats to bounce upon.
What great albums since 2000 have had both - great music, great lyrics?
Or does it matter? Can atmospherics reign alone? Does music without lyrical craft have as much meaning?
(not taking sides here - I love Fennesz and Frightened Rabbit equally - just curious how things are trending...)
False premise - assumes P4k's top 20 (and even more narrowly, top 20 of a single year) is representative of the era. Also, your point is "around half" don't have great lyrics? So, around half do...
Also, thirded or whatever on April. And TV on the Radio. And the Walkmen. And Shearwater. And Nick Cave & the Bad Seeds. And Fleet Foxes. And {{{Sunset}}}. Damn, there goes all of the "non-hip-hop" albums in my top 10 except #1 Portishead, which I'll concede doesn't have lyrics which are inherently great, though they work damn well as performed.
Lastly, fuck this "post" shit. You're telling a bullshit narrative about a movement from music w/ lyrics to music w/o. What about previous periods w/o lyrics, like a shit ton of classical music? Maybe we're living in a pre-lyrical era - we've not yet begun to listen to the next round of music with great lyrics...
Anyway, nice try, but this point fails epically.
#8
Posted 04 March 2009 - 06:21 AM

That's only to name a few. I strongly disagree with this claim.


#9
Posted 04 March 2009 - 08:06 AM
#10
Posted 04 March 2009 - 08:09 AM
#11
Posted 04 March 2009 - 08:11 AM
#12
Posted 04 March 2009 - 08:13 AM
#13
Posted 04 March 2009 - 10:48 AM
How many of the acclaimed non-hip-hop albums of the last few years can you think of that have great lyrics? Of 2008's P4k top 20, around half had either no words, nearly unintelligible words, or words that were merely fluff for electronic beats to bounce upon.
What great albums since 2000 have had both - great music, great lyrics?
Or does it matter? Can atmospherics reign alone? Does music without lyrical craft have as much meaning?
(not taking sides here - I love Fennesz and Frightened Rabbit equally - just curious how things are trending...)
False premise - assumes P4k's top 20 (and even more narrowly, top 20 of a single year) is representative of the era. Also, your point is "around half" don't have great lyrics? So, around half do...
Also, thirded or whatever on April. And TV on the Radio. And the Walkmen. And Shearwater. And Nick Cave & the Bad Seeds. And Fleet Foxes. And {{{Sunset}}}. Damn, there goes all of the "non-hip-hop" albums in my top 10 except #1 Portishead, which I'll concede doesn't have lyrics which are inherently great, though they work damn well as performed.
Lastly, fuck this "post" shit. You're telling a bullshit narrative about a movement from music w/ lyrics to music w/o. What about previous periods w/o lyrics, like a shit ton of classical music? Maybe we're living in a pre-lyrical era - we've not yet begun to listen to the next round of music with great lyrics...
Anyway, nice try, but this point fails epically.
I'll definitely have to recheck April. Guess I didn't give it much of a chance, despite the fact that RHP were a 90s staple for me. And certainly agree with many of the others as well.
Not trying to make a point with this post, but wondering if lyrics are less necessary to connect to the masses in the rock/pop vein than they have been for awhile. And wondering whether there is any reason for that to happen?
I agree with you that in classical (at this point in time), and heck nobody's even mentioned jazz yet, lyrics are a side dish to accompany the main. Perhaps it is a function of the lyrical stamina within the genre. Maybe there are limits to what can be expressed through words, more colors possible through musical tone, and once a genre has exhausted topics lyrically, the music alone labors on to express the emotions left uncaptured.
Conversely, it could be a function of critical maturity. Perhaps ability to fully assess the emotional content of a music beyond lyrical content comes with listening experience?
Or is it a function of industry? Are good lyrics harder to create? Perhaps good lyrics require multiple performances, revisions, the sculpting hand of time. And in an industry requiring quick turn around, where the productive/lucrative life of a song is much shorter, there's not incentive to put work into lyrical content.
I also like the point that our musical tastes are not derived from one musical tradition. If one can include Fennesz (electroambient), Frightened Rabbit (indie pub rock), TVOTR (black industrial rock), Fleet Foxes (pastoral folk rock), Why? (indie-absurdist-hop), Hauschka (acoustic piano gimmickry), Olof Arnalds (Scandyfolk), No Age (LA garage punk), Okkervil River (country-tinged rock), Paavoharju (electroambient/freakfolk collage), Gang Gang Dance (trans-border freak pop), Fuck Buttons (fluorescent electronoise), Flying Lotus (eroded ambient beats) all among one's top listens, appreciating them all for interesting/challenging/enjoyable albums they are, shouldn't that be seen more as a sign of popular musical progress than of loss?
Cheers to everyone replying thoughtfully.
#15
Posted 04 March 2009 - 11:24 AM
#16
Posted 04 March 2009 - 02:26 PM
How many of the acclaimed non-hip-hop albums of the last few years can you think of that have great lyrics? Of 2008's P4k top 20, around half had either no words, nearly unintelligible words, or words that were merely fluff for electronic beats to bounce upon.
What great albums since 2000 have had both - great music, great lyrics?
Or does it matter? Can atmospherics reign alone? Does music without lyrical craft have as much meaning?
(not taking sides here - I love Fennesz and Frightened Rabbit equally - just curious how things are trending...)
False premise - assumes P4k's top 20 (and even more narrowly, top 20 of a single year) is representative of the era. Also, your point is "around half" don't have great lyrics? So, around half do...
Also, thirded or whatever on April. And TV on the Radio. And the Walkmen. And Shearwater. And Nick Cave & the Bad Seeds. And Fleet Foxes. And {{{Sunset}}}. Damn, there goes all of the "non-hip-hop" albums in my top 10 except #1 Portishead, which I'll concede doesn't have lyrics which are inherently great, though they work damn well as performed.
Lastly, fuck this "post" shit. You're telling a bullshit narrative about a movement from music w/ lyrics to music w/o. What about previous periods w/o lyrics, like a shit ton of classical music? Maybe we're living in a pre-lyrical era - we've not yet begun to listen to the next round of music with great lyrics...
Anyway, nice try, but this point fails epically.
I'll definitely have to recheck April. Guess I didn't give it much of a chance, despite the fact that RHP were a 90s staple for me. And certainly agree with many of the others as well.
Not trying to make a point with this post, but wondering if lyrics are less necessary to connect to the masses in the rock/pop vein than they have been for awhile. And wondering whether there is any reason for that to happen?
I agree with you that in classical (at this point in time), and heck nobody's even mentioned jazz yet, lyrics are a side dish to accompany the main. Perhaps it is a function of the lyrical stamina within the genre. Maybe there are limits to what can be expressed through words, more colors possible through musical tone, and once a genre has exhausted topics lyrically, the music alone labors on to express the emotions left uncaptured.
Conversely, it could be a function of critical maturity. Perhaps ability to fully assess the emotional content of a music beyond lyrical content comes with listening experience?
Or is it a function of industry? Are good lyrics harder to create? Perhaps good lyrics require multiple performances, revisions, the sculpting hand of time. And in an industry requiring quick turn around, where the productive/lucrative life of a song is much shorter, there's not incentive to put work into lyrical content.
I also like the point that our musical tastes are not derived from one musical tradition. If one can include Fennesz (electroambient), Frightened Rabbit (indie pub rock), TVOTR (black industrial rock), Fleet Foxes (pastoral folk rock), Why? (indie-absurdist-hop), Hauschka (acoustic piano gimmickry), Olof Arnalds (Scandyfolk), No Age (LA garage punk), Okkervil River (country-tinged rock), Paavoharju (electroambient/freakfolk collage), Gang Gang Dance (trans-border freak pop), Fuck Buttons (fluorescent electronoise), Flying Lotus (eroded ambient beats) all among one's top listens, appreciating them all for interesting/challenging/enjoyable albums they are, shouldn't that be seen more as a sign of popular musical progress than of loss?
Cheers to everyone replying thoughtfully.
OK, this is much better thought out than the original post and deserves an intelligent response...so later tonight. I warn you that I'm going to have to invoke Hegel...
This is almost a Sickpup thread, btw












