Dave Grohl?
I'm pretty sure the chord progressions he's been playing aren't all that novel.
Posted 11 December 2008 - 04:13 PM
Dave Grohl?
Posted 11 December 2008 - 04:17 PM
Posted 11 December 2008 - 04:34 PM
Mr Montana, I really did LOL at this statement.Not a surprise. The combination of the Best Buy exclusive and the worst economic downtrun since the great depression really hurt the sales. No one is shopping at Best Buy anymore. Had Axl had the album out in the open like Kanyne, it would have easily matched. Also, don't forget that Kanye was about 400,000 units off his previous mark.
Posted 11 December 2008 - 04:36 PM
Mr Montana, I really did LOL at this statement.Not a surprise. The combination of the Best Buy exclusive and the worst economic downtrun since the great depression really hurt the sales. No one is shopping at Best Buy anymore. Had Axl had the album out in the open like Kanyne, it would have easily matched. Also, don't forget that Kanye was about 400,000 units off his previous mark.
I am sure this album's poor sales figures have nothing to do with the fact that the album is mediocre, at best. I would also wager more people downloaded this album for free than actually paid for it.
Posted 11 December 2008 - 04:41 PM
it's over, Obama won, you can drop the stump speechYou're right. The fact that the album was exclusively sold at a luxury store in the greatest economic downturn since the great depression that no one is shopping at had anything to do with it.
Posted 11 December 2008 - 04:43 PM
Posted 11 December 2008 - 04:48 PM
"Luxury store"? It's not fuckin' Saks. Lot of luxury stores on the outskirts of DeKalb and Sycamore, yeah.
Posted 11 December 2008 - 04:55 PM
Posted 11 December 2008 - 04:57 PM
Posted 11 December 2008 - 04:58 PM

Posted 11 December 2008 - 04:59 PM
Canada hates black peopleIt's now #5 (from it's debut at #1) in Canada. Kanye dropped #4 to #15 on the same chart.
Posted 11 December 2008 - 05:01 PM
Canada hates black peopleIt's now #5 (from it's debut at #1) in Canada. Kanye dropped #4 to #15 on the same chart.

Posted 11 December 2008 - 05:07 PM
just because the average price of goods at Best Buy is higher, it's not like they made you walk out with a fucking $4000 60" Pioneer Kuro if you wanted to buy Chinese Democracy, good lord.
all you had to do if you wanted the record is go to Best Buy or buy it online on their website. what, is it impossible to walk into a Best Buy purchase one CD and nothing else and walk out?
What's your excuse for the lack of iTunes sales this week then?
not denying that store specific exclusives aren't dumb, but the whole "luxury store" is a bit silly when you can just walk in, pick it off one of the huge kiosks they have displaying it, and checkout in 5 minutes or less.
It's now #5 (from it's debut at #1) in Canada. Kanye dropped #4 to #15 on the same chart.
Posted 11 December 2008 - 05:49 PM
Posted 11 December 2008 - 05:56 PM
Posted 11 December 2008 - 06:20 PM
not denying that store specific exclusives aren't dumb, but the whole "luxury store" is a bit silly when you can just walk in, pick it off one of the huge kiosks they have displaying it, and checkout in 5 minutes or less.
Posted 11 December 2008 - 06:28 PM
Posted 11 December 2008 - 06:30 PM
Mr Montana, I really did LOL at this statement.Not a surprise. The combination of the Best Buy exclusive and the worst economic downtrun since the great depression really hurt the sales. No one is shopping at Best Buy anymore. Had Axl had the album out in the open like Kanyne, it would have easily matched. Also, don't forget that Kanye was about 400,000 units off his previous mark.
I am sure this album's poor sales figures have nothing to do with the fact that the album is mediocre, at best. I would also wager more people downloaded this album for free than actually paid for it.
You're right. The fact that the album was exclusively sold at a luxury store in the greatest economic downturn since the great depression that no one is shopping at had anything to do with it.
Posted 11 December 2008 - 06:36 PM
People aren't spending money on things that aren't necessary right now... and yet they would have been willing to spend an extra 10 bucks at Wal-Mart on a new Guns 'n' Roses album? I just don't think that's very plausible logic.
Posted 11 December 2008 - 06:39 PM
People aren't spending money on things that aren't necessary right now... and yet they would have been willing to spend an extra 10 bucks at Wal-Mart on a new Guns 'n' Roses album? I just don't think that's very plausible logic.