Erlewine is like the Frank Zappa of music criticism, incredibly prolific, daring, brash, a lot of people are torn on if they like him or not. Also, he died in 1991 and has a son named Dweezil.
The Unterberger family of criticism is great too, everyone should have Andrew's blog bookmarked really. Always a great read. Richie Unterberger is kind of a gay, but I enjoy his writing.
Paves and I are of course great at what we do, but we just don't write enough and admittedly knock a lot of our style of Mark Prindle, who of course, is the man.
EDIT: sombies (brent d, sickpup, sask) are all great, great critics, particularly Sask. but yeah, Good Dr. Bill, he's one of my favorite writers period, to be quite honest. His ability as a writer is really fucking intimidating considering he's in my age group, meaning I have to compete for a job when people like him exist on this planet.
QUOTE(Pavement Ist Rad @ Mar 7 2007, 08:24 PM) [snapback]330953[/snapback]
Stefan kind of sucks, though. Sometimes. His Mars Volta review ruled.
I like his Arcade Fire review, he's just completely different from us in terms of style, still blog-esque but more long-winded and really fuckin bombastic.
QUOTE(elastico @ Mar 7 2007, 03:27 PM) [snapback]330739[/snapback]
I remember two years ago or something, reading "It's such a pain in the ass reviewing bands that people actually give a crap about. It's not like I'm reviewing Hor or Confront James and can just write "Look at my butt!" and nobody will care," and not being able to stop laughing for ten minutes. Yeah, Prindle.
OTM. It's awesome that whenever someone mentions Prindle on this board and cites something he's written, I remember exactly where it's from and generally share the exact same reaction.