Jarl Sigurd's Symphony Exotic in F-sharp minor
Completed in mid February 2000 this work, in all likelihood, holds the distiction of being the
first symphony composed during the new millenium. It is unusual in that in addition to utilizing
the sounds of standard orchestral instruments, it also includes sitar sounds to give it a more
exotic feel(hence the name). It consists of three movements and, like the nine tone symphony,
it tells a story.
Andante An occidental potentate developes a liking for the mysterious soma plant which can
only be found in the distant Himalayas. He dispatches an expedition to the Himalayas to go
searching for the plant. The beginning of this movement coincides with their arrival in the
Himalayas and the start of their search.
Link to track:
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=8,0,0,0" width="335" height="28" id="divplaylist"><param name="movie" value="http://www.divshare.com/flash/playlist?myId=4089606-704" /><embed src="http://www.divshare.com/flash/playlist?myId=4089606-704" width="335" height="28" name="divplaylist" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer"></embed></object>

On each of these tracks, the string, brass, woodwind and sitar parts were done on this electric guitar.
Note the absence of a midi pickup. One of the things I discovered early on about midi guitar is that one
does not need to use a midi pickup to make quality midi guitar music. In fact, I found I got better tracking
without the pickup. I plug my guitar directly into my Roland GI-10 midi interface. The only disadvantage
of not using a midi pickup is that only can only play single note lines(no chords). Since I've always been
primarily a lead guitarist, that is not a problem for me.
Responses on Usenet:
QUOTE
Well I did take the time out to listen to a few tracks on Jarl's website.
First off, let me say that the images of a guitar conjur up expectations of
expression, musical finesse and feeling. Having listened to several minutes
from several of Jarl's so called concerto's, I failed to keep a straight
face. Sorry, but this is awful. There is simply no expression at all in this
music, not to mention structure. The piano sounds as though its being hit
with a hammer, and its obviously quantised far too much. The choice of
sounds in general could be considered fair, but as others have pointed out,
the quality is of a mediocre wavetable soundcard. Whilst I dont think its
fair to judge any work on the quality of instruments available, comparing
yourself to a philarmonic orchestra in this case is really taking the 'p'.
There were a few seconds of melody amongst this jumble of noises, but I cant
see many listeners relaxing to an hour or so of this stuff. Maybe its the
guitar that prevents you from injecting any expression into these pieces,
but I'm sure you are not doing yourself Justice, Jarl, by the way you've
recorded this stuff. The use of orchestral stabs and timpanis randomly
thrown in to the recordings, strings which simply dont sound stringy and a
cacophony of discordant tones and styles... well perhaps I'm missing the
point here but I really cant see what use a midi guitar is to man or beast
if this is what it produces! Try slowing it all down, adding more
expression to a few of the lead sounds, cut out the quantising, add some
dynamics in to the voices, a bit of reverb..... or perhaps just go out and
listen to a real orchestra before proceeding any further!!!
Sorry this didnt do anything for me, well maybe it did... It's made me
realise that perhaps my music ain't so bad after all!
QUOTE
> And it is because that the music I've heard leaves no doubt with me that
> what the composer must have heard in his head has been truly beautiful,
> that I conclude that Jarl Sigurd is within reach of becoming a truly
> great composer. I think we should all think very carefully before acting
> in ways which might be construed as that we do not commend his noble and
> unselfish initiative of trying to bring to us what he is hearing
> himself.
This is the silliest thing I've EVER read in a review. Jarl is in no
danger of becoming a "GREAT" composer. He may be in danger of becoming a
composer but *that* has yet to be seen.
What Jarl hears in his head is the same poorly constructed mish-mash
that we have also had the displeasure of hearing. It is not "truly
beautiful" - it is truly bad. He has no concept of harmonic usuage,
rhythmic or melodic developement, aestetics in orchestration, etc.
etc... He is just a bad composer who continually spams here and gets all
us fools to download his crap just to see "what all the fuss is about".
Your poetics in prose can't change that.
QUOTE
agree with that, but with one qualifier:
The loop-pasters may indeed be uncreative people doing unimaginative
identikit music, but I could probably listen to a song they release
without feeling the urge to plug my own ears with cavity foam
insulation.
What really 'winds me up' about Jarl is not the music he releases, or
even his constant self-promotion. It's the seemingly unassailable notion
he has that what he produces actually sounds pleasant.
You can't improve if you already think you're the best. I know,
personally, that my music also stinks. I've got seven synths, bad co-
ordination, yet I still try and play them all at once.
But I've /never/ been under the impression that anything I've done is
good, no matter how much I liked the idea for Journey.
Richard