Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Bears Sign Griese
Sound Opinions Message Board > Anything Goes > Et Cetera
tjenz
QUOTE
Griese agrees to five-year deal with Bears

March 21, 2006

CHICAGO (AP) -- Brian Griese agreed to a five-year deal with the Chicago Bears on Tuesday, adding depth at quarterback and a potential challenger to starter Rex Grossman.

"I don't think there's any question he's going into the position to compete for the job," Griese's agent Ralph Cindrich said. "That was made clear."


The 31-year-old Griese completed 112-of-174 passes for 1,136 yards and led Tampa Bay to a 5-1 start last year before a season-ending knee injury. The Buccaneers decided to waive him this month rather than pay a $2.6 million roster bonus.

Griese has passed for 16,344 yards and 103 touchdowns in eight seasons with Denver, Miami and Tampa Bay.

Cindrich said Griese passed physicals with the Bears, Cincinnati and Tampa Bay, and "he'll be ready to go" in time for minicamp. Cindrich, who would not reveal the financial terms of the deal, said the contract will likely be signed on Wednesday.

The Bears have said they are committed to Grossman as their starter, but Griese has started 72 of 75 games in his career.

Cindrich said the Bears made no promises

After tearing the ACL in his right knee early in the 2004 season, Grossman broke his left ankle in the preseason and missed the first 13 games. Chad Hutchinson flopped, and rookie Kyle Orton began the season as the starting quarterback.

Behind a defense that was ranked No. 1 for much of the season, a strong offensive line and effective running game, the Bears went 11-5 and reached the playoffs for the first time since 2001.

Grossman's numbers -- 20-of-39 passing for 259 yards in two games -- weren't overwhelming, but the passing game opened up when he returned.

if Griese stays healthy this could be really good for the Bears
MattW
Not that he'll get the job, but his low-key, clock-management style of play seems to be a much better fit for Turner's offense than Rex Grossman's west coast style.

Just sayin...
crease
But a five-year deal?
Slackmo
QUOTE(MattW @ Mar 22 2006, 09:36 AM) [snapback]47729[/snapback]

Not that he'll get the job, but his low-key, clock-management style of play seems to be a much better fit for Turner's offense than Rex Grossman's west coast style.

Just sayin...


Which is another way of saying that Griese will be working with his weakest receiving corps ever. Look for a career-ending injury to Muhammad by week 7.
petey
QUOTE(crease @ Mar 22 2006, 09:39 AM) [snapback]47732[/snapback]

But a five-year deal?


That means nothing with NFL contracts. It probably has very little guaranteed money and a bunch of incentives.
Seamus
Further proof the Bears will never figure out what to do with the quarterback position. This is kind of a weird move. I mean, Griese's a'ight but...now Grossman, who was touted as the future and whatnot, has to deal with this guy coming in gunning for the starting position? I understand some competition for that position is healthy, and maybe Griese will get the job, but...I dunno man, weird move. Not sure how I feel about this. He's got pretty good career stats but...man.

Conflicted Cubedweller
NumberTenOx
Bears get greasy?
jmmrsn
I think it was a good move. I can only see Griese starting if Rex gets hurt (good chance) or he plays horribly. I would rather see Griese out there instead of Orton. The other teams interested in griese were Tampa Bay (who chose Simms over Griese for the starting job) and Cincinnati which has C. Palmer as the starter. Chicago was his best chance of playing. He could push for the starting job but i can't see him beating Rex for it. It's grossman's job to lose...
Ben
Seems like a good second-stringer/insurance policy. What's up with Kyle Orton?
kilgore trout
It wouldn't matter if Peyton Manning were in a Bears uniform. Who the hell is he gonna throw to?
LA Mat
What can it hurt to sign him?
without_opinion
QUOTE(All Your Base Are Belong To Us @ Mar 22 2006, 12:23 PM) [snapback]47879[/snapback]

It wouldn't matter if Peyton Manning were in a Bears uniform. Who the hell is he gonna throw to?


as a colts fan, without him you guys are still ultimately having the same level of success as we are with him.
nobodies
QUOTE(All Your Base Are Belong To Us @ Mar 22 2006, 12:23 PM) [snapback]47879[/snapback]

It wouldn't matter if Peyton Manning were in a Bears uniform. Who the hell is he gonna throw to?


Amen. I would have been a helluva lot more excited about the signing of another quality receiver; and a corner or two.
rudayo
QUOTE(All Your Base Are Belong To Us @ Mar 22 2006, 12:23 PM) [snapback]47879[/snapback]

It wouldn't matter if Peyton Manning were in a Bears uniform. Who the hell is he gonna throw to?

Your prayers are answered...
IPB Image
Sinorice Moss

My guess is they Bears will draft a WR in Round 1.




It's a weak class this year.
MattW
Every website and expert is predicting that they're getting Fasano, that TE out of Notre Dame. He should be a good blocking TE with some speed and hands. Again, if the receiver core is going to be TE based with Fasano and Clark, I like Griese more than Grossman though it's Grossman's job to lose.
SpacemanSpiff
Griese is OK, but a WR would be much, much more appreciated by this Bears fan.
Moose is the probably one of the top three No. 2 receivers in the game right now, but he damn sure ain't a no.1. That Moss kid from Miami would be nice though.
sin city
QUOTE(SpacemanSpiff @ Mar 22 2006, 01:50 PM) [snapback]47949[/snapback]
Griese is OK, but a WR would be much, much more appreciated by this Bears fan.
Moose is the probably one of the top three No. 2 receivers in the game right now, but he damn sure ain't a no.1. That Moss kid from Miami would be nice though.


if the Bears truly see TE as a need, they need to stop dicking around and trade up for the TE from Maryland, Vernon Davis
IPB Image

fast as a receiver, strong as a linebacker- this guys a stud, plain and simple.
EastBayJ
QUOTE(MattW @ Mar 22 2006, 11:39 AM) [snapback]47947[/snapback]

Every website and expert is predicting that they're getting Fasano, that TE out of Notre Dame. He should be a good blocking TE with some speed and hands. Again, if the receiver core is going to be TE based with Fasano and Clark, I like Griese more than Grossman though it's Grossman's job to lose.

All the early mock drafts I've seen had the Bears taking a TE in the first round, however I have never seen Fasano's name mentioned. All of those mock drafts had the Bears taking either Leonard Pope from Georgia, Marcedes Lewis from UCLA, or Dominique Byrd from USC. Since the Bears failed to sign Randle El, some of the mock drafts have changed and now have the Bears taking a WR.
SpacemanSpiff
QUOTE(sin city @ Mar 22 2006, 01:55 PM) [snapback]47955[/snapback]

if the Bears truly see TE as a need, they need to stop dicking around and trade up for the TE from Maryland, Vernon Davis
IPB Image

fast as a receiver, strong as a linebacker- this guys a stud, plain and simple.


So are we talking the next Antonio Gates, or what? Just how good is this guy?
rudayo
I'd be happy with Pope. The Bears have enough small "speed" type receivers already.
EastBayJ
QUOTE(SpacemanSpiff @ Mar 22 2006, 12:00 PM) [snapback]47963[/snapback]

So are we talking the next Antonio Gates, or what? Just how good is this guy?

Good enough to be a considered as a top 10 draft pick.

QUOTE
Vernon Davis, TE, Maryland – Davis produced the jaw-dropper moment of the combine, running a 4.38 in the 40-yard dash – a ridiculous feat for a guy who checked in at 6-foot-3 3/4 and 254 pounds. In terms of sheer shock, it rivaled Matt Jones' 4.38 time in the 40 last year. According to some scouts, Davis' physique was the most impressive, too. Davis did well in pass-receiving drills and actually looked dominant at times in pass-blocking drills. His 42-inch vertical jump amazed, and he won the broad jump for his position (10-8) by almost 10 inches over the next best effort. Davis likely pushed himself into the draft's top eight selections.
SpacemanSpiff
QUOTE(EastBayJ @ Mar 22 2006, 02:05 PM) [snapback]47972[/snapback]

Good enough to be a considered as a top 10 draft pick.


Good god. Hell of a combine for that guy, wasn't it? Probably no way in hell the Bears will try to move up for him, though. It'd be nice.
MCF
Look at Griese's numbers before you fault the Bears here. The guy is a stud compared to Grossman, that's for sure.

I say the Grossman love goes out the window and Griese is the starting QB by mid-season and starts the next 4 consecutive years...
tjenz
What about this guy?
IPB Image
sure he's clubhouse cancer, but...
would free up a draft spot for a good corner back, their biggest need on the D

EastBayJ
QUOTE(The Priest @ Mar 22 2006, 12:20 PM) [snapback]47997[/snapback]

What about this guy?
IPB Image
sure he's clubhouse cancer, but...
would free up a draft spot for a good corner back, their biggest need on the D

T.O.'s gonna be dancing on the star this season.

IPB Image
MCF
QUOTE(EastBayJ @ Mar 22 2006, 02:23 PM) [snapback]48003[/snapback]

T.O.'s gonna be dancing on the star this season.

IPB Image


Best move Dallas ever made. He's got his money.

Damn, is he gonna be an incredible one-two punch with Terry Glenn, or what? Glenn going over the middle, T.O. going long.

Pick up Bledsoe in your NFL Draft....
rudayo
Meanwhile, the Cowboy offensive line will be picking up Bledsoe from the turf.
Poptimus Crime
It doesn't hurt to have Orton as the #3 to develop him into an NFL qb and a good backup. I'd like a receiver and/or a great TE. Where to the Bears pick - do they have a chance at Vernon Davis ?
sin city
QUOTE(Pastichio Medley @ Mar 22 2006, 02:56 PM) [snapback]48066[/snapback]
It doesn't hurt to have Orton as the #3 to develop him into an NFL qb and a good backup. I'd like a receiver and/or a great TE. Where to the Bears pick - do they have a chance at Vernon Davis ?

unless they trade way up, no. Package Benson or Briggs with a draft choice and then go crazy, I say...
Stan Gable
Package last year's first round pick, a pro-bowl LB (soon to be all-pro) and this year's #1 pick to move up sixteen slots?

You're an NFL genius.

Edit: Oops, you wrote Benson *or* Briggs, not *and*.
sin city
QUOTE(Stan Gable @ Mar 22 2006, 03:04 PM) [snapback]48078[/snapback]
Package last year's first round pick, a pro-bowl LB (soon to be all-pro) and this year's #1 pick to move up sixteen slots?

You're an NFL genius.


not and, or.


and thank you for recognizing my genius. Fact is the Bears will lose Briggs in free agency anyway (his agent is Rosenhaus and he's already demanded more than Urlacher makes), so go after a true need position.

Hell, Davis can play both ways. TE and take over Briggs spot at LB- he's big and fast enough, so why the hell not?

kilgore trout
QUOTE(Stan Gable @ Mar 22 2006, 05:04 PM) [snapback]48078[/snapback]

Package last year's first round pick, a pro-bowl LB (soon to be all-pro) and this year's #1 pick to move up sixteen slots?

You're an NFL genius.

Edit: Oops, you wrote Benson *or* Briggs, not *and*.


Actually, this sort of thinking will land you a GM position at Clark & Addison.
Stan Gable
QUOTE(sin city @ Mar 22 2006, 03:09 PM) [snapback]48085[/snapback]

not and, or.
and thank you for recognizing my genius. Fact is the Bears will lose Briggs in free agency anyway (his agent is Rosenhaus and he's already demanded more than Urlacher makes), so go after a true need position.

Hell, Davis can play both ways. TE and take over Briggs spot at LB- he's big and fast enough, so why the hell not?



Please don't start the "play both ways" talk with Davis until we actually draft him. *Then* you can start making ridiculous statements like that.

Anyway, I hope you're wrong about Briggs and FA. I know that the Bears are making it a priority to sign him prior to this year's camp and I hope it gets done. Although, I'm sure they'll be hard pressed to put that much money into one position (LB) when there are other needs. But I think they have something special at LB and are getting by cheap elsewhere (OLB, S, CB) to complain.
SpacemanSpiff
QUOTE(sin city @ Mar 22 2006, 03:09 PM) [snapback]48085[/snapback]


Fact is the Bears will lose Briggs in free agency anyway (his agent is Rosenhaus and he's already demanded more than Urlacher makes), so go after a true need position.


I kinda had this same inkling. I was hoping that the Bears would realize this in time to try to sign either Will Witherspoon or Lavar Arrington, but it doesn't look like either one will pan out, leaving the team to rebuild their linebacking corps yet again. Seems like they do it every 3 years, doesn't it?
sin city
QUOTE(Stan Gable @ Mar 22 2006, 03:15 PM) [snapback]48096[/snapback]



Please don't start the "play both ways" talk with Davis until we actually draft him. *Then* you can start making ridiculous statements like that.

Anyway, I hope you're wrong about Briggs and FA. I know that the Bears are making it a priority to sign him prior to this year's camp and I hope it gets done. Although, I'm sure they'll be hard pressed to put that much money into one position (LB) when there are other needs. But I think they have something special at LB and are getting by cheap elsewhere (OLB, S, CB) to complain.


I know sarcasm doesn't translate well over the internet, but Jiminy Christmas, did you really think I was serious about playing both ways?

I mean, home games maybe, but every week?! And the fact is, with this much salary cap room, why not make a play for Davis? Is TE a need or not? If you're just going to draft the 3rd or 4th best TE and just make him block 90% of the time, just draft a lineman.
SpacemanSpiff
QUOTE(sin city @ Mar 22 2006, 03:46 PM) [snapback]48135[/snapback]

I know sarcasm doesn't translate well over the internet, but Jiminy Christmas, did you really think I was serious about playing both ways?

I mean, home games maybe, but every week?! And the fact is, with this much salary cap room, why not make a play for Davis? Is TE a need or not? If you're just going to draft the 3rd or 4th best TE and just make him block 90% of the time, just draft a lineman.


I would hope that whatever TE they do end up drafting would be a pass catcher, at the very least.
If the one they draft can actually catch passes, though, and be a legitimate offensive threat, I predict Thomas Jones pushes 1500 yards next year.
I mean, look what happened the the RBs on the teams that got Gates, Gonzalez, and Shockey. A pass-catching TE is all the Bears need to open up this offense, aside from a reliable QB, of course. I think they may just have enough help at WR to hold them over for awhile.
Stan Gable
QUOTE(sin city @ Mar 22 2006, 03:46 PM) [snapback]48135[/snapback]

I know sarcasm doesn't translate well over the internet, but Jiminy Christmas, did you really think I was serious about playing both ways?

I mean, home games maybe, but every week?! And the fact is, with this much salary cap room, why not make a play for Davis? Is TE a need or not? If you're just going to draft the 3rd or 4th best TE and just make him block 90% of the time, just draft a lineman.



Well, last season on a Bears board people were suggesting that the Bears play Vasher at WR, too. So, I just wasn't sure....

I'd love to go after Davis, but I think there are a few other TEs in the draft (from what I've read - I'm not a big college football guy) that can get out and grab the ball. I still think the position needs to be addressed in the first few rounds b/c, like Spaceman pointed out, a TE with hands can really open up the offense.

This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.