User
Sep 29 2009, 11:01 AM
It was cheap and pathetic, the way the story was handled. They didn't actually touch on her arguments at all, just made some banal point about her getting big on myspace and laughing it off. Seriously, a flimsy ad hominem attack on Lily Allen? That's what they thinks constitutes good journalism? My fifth grade class was taught that not to argue like that. It was, frankly, deeply offputting. I could stand to listen for a few more minutes, but I just kept noticing how vapid and unreasonable all of the "coverage" is.