Explain your answers please...

I'd be all for it, but it would never work, too many people.

If not 100% socialism, then what about a Socialist agenda from our leaders. Would that be good or bad for America?

What's wrong with being social?

Yes...

I mean no...

SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!

Quit asking these random "intellectual" questions that are pondered by fucking junior high students across the United States.


I am going to attempt to redirect this thread.

Would the dropping of the SOMB admins balls be a good thing for this board?

Now THAT is music.

Socialism starts reeking of mob rule after awhile--that's my big problem with it. They make all of these rules and regulations that are supposed to be for the benifit of society, but if you are squashing the potential of the individual, then isnt that HARMFUL for society???

I live in the birthplace of North American socialism. It works here.

What do you think of the US's form of socialism? Mandated Health Insurance, for instance. To me it is more like Corporate Socialism. If you don't give up your individuality and tow the corporate line/the corporate way of thinking, then you are bascially an outlaw...

It's definitely different from what we have here, but if it enables your average person to go see the doctor for nothing or a woman to go have a baby for practically free of charge, I see no reason to complain.

No its actually the evil Candian government that does, just like the evil Australian government here and the evil English government over there.

If your not paid by a corporation, then its not right.

The guy lives there.

It doesnt do either of those things.

Then our system is clearly better.

This is a flamebait thread. Closed.