Mitchell
Apr 30 2006, 12:24 PM
What a lot of effort that looks like. I will be very happy if I never hear a RHCP song again. Maybe I can deal with "Scar Tissue" every now and again.
Chex Mix Dancer
Apr 30 2006, 12:25 PM
QUOTE(Gareth Keenan Invetigates @ Apr 30 2006, 12:24 PM) [snapback]77267[/snapback]
What a lot of effort that looks like. I will be very happy if I never hear a RHCP song again. Maybe I can deal with "Scar Tissue" every now and again.
Are you not enjoying, Gareth? Or are you just sick of them after a double album listen?
Mitchell
Apr 30 2006, 12:33 PM
I have no intention of sitting through the album on the account that I think BSSM, Californication and By The Way aren't very good. They all felt like double albums anyway, especially BSSM.
shimmy
Apr 30 2006, 12:39 PM
QUOTE(Gareth Keenan Invetigates @ Apr 30 2006, 10:33 AM) [snapback]77269[/snapback]
I have no intention of sitting through the album on the account that I think BSSM, Californication and By The Way aren't very good. They all felt like double albums anyway, especially BSSM.
give it a try...its 2 hours of your life. disc 2 is SMOKIN!
Mitchell
Apr 30 2006, 12:43 PM
no.
elementus
Apr 30 2006, 12:45 PM
At least the man is standing by his principles.
Wilcoinator
Apr 30 2006, 12:46 PM
Have I ever said how much I hate rapidshare? I will have to wait 160 minutes to get both albums, not to mention the single. Damn.
Mitchell
Apr 30 2006, 12:51 PM
QUOTE(elementus @ Apr 30 2006, 06:45 PM) [snapback]77275[/snapback]
At least the man is standing by his principles.
Well say you didn't like Oasis aside one or two songs on a couple of their albums and despite trying you just don't like it. Would you waste time downloading a double album and listen to it for two hours? Half the bloody album will end up being singles at any rate.
Undercooked Sausage
Apr 30 2006, 12:51 PM
Why back in my day it took an hour to download a whole song. I refuse to believe anyone can actually complain about downloading speeds these days.
elementus
Apr 30 2006, 01:00 PM
QUOTE(Gareth Keenan Invetigates @ Apr 30 2006, 01:51 PM) [snapback]77278[/snapback]
QUOTE(elementus @ Apr 30 2006, 06:45 PM) [snapback]77275[/snapback]
At least the man is standing by his principles.
Well say you didn't like Oasis aside one or two songs on a couple of their albums and despite trying you just don't like it. Would you waste time downloading a double album and listen to it for two hours? Half the bloody album will end up being singles at any rate.
I'm not blaming you man. I understand people have different musical tastes. I'm not trying to change yours.
shimmy
Apr 30 2006, 01:04 PM
between this, the new phoenix, king biscuit time and futureheads its been a good week.
gringo
Apr 30 2006, 01:11 PM
there's a new king bscuit time?
l_p_4_7
Apr 30 2006, 02:17 PM
yes, and it leaked ages ago.
Chex Mix Dancer
Apr 30 2006, 02:35 PM
QUOTE(shimmy @ Apr 30 2006, 01:04 PM) [snapback]77281[/snapback]
between this, the new phoenix, king biscuit time and futureheads its been a good week.
Cept for Futureheads...which im not a fan of...it's been a very good week for yours truly.
QUOTE(Sausage To The Extreme @ Apr 30 2006, 12:51 PM) [snapback]77279[/snapback]
Why back in my day it took an hour to download a whole song. I refuse to believe anyone can actually complain about downloading speeds these days.
Actually, my downloads on soulseek take an absurdly long time. Around 2 hours for one song. So i reserve the right to bitch about those.
l_p_4_7
Apr 30 2006, 04:10 PM
King Biscuit Time - Black Gold
CODE
http://www.filefactory.com/?85be46
Artem
Apr 30 2006, 04:12 PM
who's it by?
gringo
Apr 30 2006, 04:19 PM
QUOTE(l_p_4_7 @ Apr 30 2006, 10:10 PM) [snapback]77335[/snapback]
King Biscuit Time
CODE
http://www.filefactory.com/?85be46
thanks a lot man
DrJimmy
Apr 30 2006, 05:04 PM
have to say, that king biscuit time album was a disappointment.
a better copy of RHCP is up on Oink
dbt_boy
Apr 30 2006, 05:06 PM
QUOTE(gringo @ Apr 30 2006, 07:11 PM) [snapback]77283[/snapback]
there's a new king bscuit time?
and by the sound of things its the last. A few weeks ago he posted on his myspace that he was "going away", that he had "failed" and that was that...was officially rumoured a few days ago...gutted

albums great by the way...
shimmy
Apr 30 2006, 05:10 PM
QUOTE(DrJimmy @ Apr 30 2006, 03:04 PM) [snapback]77345[/snapback]
have to say, that king biscuit time album was a disappointment.
Dude are you serious? that album is better than the last beta album....man I think its pretty great.
QUOTE(DrJimmy @ Apr 30 2006, 03:04 PM) [snapback]77345[/snapback]
a better copy of RHCP is up on Oink
another transcode. deleted. about 20 times this has happened today.
DrJimmy
Apr 30 2006, 05:16 PM
QUOTE(shimmy @ Apr 30 2006, 06:10 PM) [snapback]77347[/snapback]
QUOTE(DrJimmy @ Apr 30 2006, 03:04 PM) [snapback]77345[/snapback]
have to say, that king biscuit time album was a disappointment.
Dude are you serious? that album is better than the last beta album....man I think its pretty great.
QUOTE(DrJimmy @ Apr 30 2006, 03:04 PM) [snapback]77345[/snapback]
a better copy of RHCP is up on Oink
another transcode. deleted. about 20 times this has happened today.
damn, my ratio took another big hit.
i don't know, i didn't like the king biscuit. i downloaded it a couple weeks ago. at first i thought it was okay, but it became pretty boring pretty fast.
l_p_4_7
Apr 30 2006, 05:21 PM
I would say the same.
It's OK (if a little bland), but for me it doesn't come close to The Three EPs/Hot Shots II.
KENAN THOMPSON
Apr 30 2006, 05:37 PM
i'll send a link to a better quality rip of the new rchp album to anyone who pms me (as long as i recognize your name)
Hewletts Daughter
Apr 30 2006, 05:46 PM
QUOTE(gringo @ Apr 30 2006, 07:57 AM) [snapback]77133[/snapback]
Well I gotta earn my keep

i like the cut of your gib. While I will not download this cause I basically detest the RHCP, I really dig that you understand the basics of give and take rather than most newbies here who are all about take take take. You're good folk. Welcome to the board.
Wilcoinator
Apr 30 2006, 05:51 PM
QUOTE(Hewletts Daughter @ Apr 30 2006, 05:46 PM) [snapback]77358[/snapback]
QUOTE(gringo @ Apr 30 2006, 07:57 AM) [snapback]77133[/snapback]
Well I gotta earn my keep

i like the cut of your gib. While I will not download this cause I basically detest the RHCP, I really dig that you understand the basics of give and take rather than most newbies here who are all about take take take. You're good folk. Welcome to the board.
WWWEEE LLLOOOOVVVEEE YYYYOOOUUUU
urge26
Apr 30 2006, 05:58 PM
I felt like I wanted to post for all the lurkers out there that don't just come here to find leaks (and beg for them for that matter)...... although I've never posted, I come here daily for the comedy aspect as well as the educated posters.
DrJimmy
Apr 30 2006, 06:07 PM
QUOTE(urge26 @ Apr 30 2006, 06:58 PM) [snapback]77362[/snapback]
I felt like I wanted to post for all the lurkers out there that don't just come here to find leaks (and beg for them for that matter)...... although I've never posted, I come here daily for the comedy aspect as well as the educated posters.
wow, it's the lurker ambassador.
l_p_4_7
Apr 30 2006, 06:11 PM
QUOTE(urge26 @ Apr 30 2006, 11:58 PM) [snapback]77362[/snapback]
I felt like I wanted to post for all the lurkers out there that don't just come here to find leaks (and beg for them for that matter)...... although I've never posted, I come here daily for the comedy aspect as well as the educated posters.
You're right. Lurker does not automatically mean leecher. Even the biggest sharing established members had to start somewhere with no posts.
Mitchell
Apr 30 2006, 06:12 PM
QUOTE(urge26 @ Apr 30 2006, 11:58 PM) [snapback]77362[/snapback]
I felt like I wanted to post for all the lurkers out there that don't just come here to find leaks (and beg for them for that matter)...... although I've never posted, I come here daily for the comedy aspect as well as the educated posters.
Tonight on SOMB...
Sausage says poop,
Dr. Bill countsdown a list,
Pavs posts some of his music,
and Solace likes stuff!!!!
KENAN THOMPSON
Apr 30 2006, 06:14 PM
QUOTE(DrJimmy @ Apr 30 2006, 06:07 PM) [snapback]77366[/snapback]
QUOTE(urge26 @ Apr 30 2006, 06:58 PM) [snapback]77362[/snapback]
I felt like I wanted to post for all the lurkers out there that don't just come here to find leaks (and beg for them for that matter)...... although I've never posted, I come here daily for the comedy aspect as well as the educated posters.
wow, it's the lurker ambassador.
QUOTE(Gareth Keenan Invetigates @ Apr 30 2006, 06:12 PM) [snapback]77369[/snapback]
QUOTE(urge26 @ Apr 30 2006, 11:58 PM) [snapback]77362[/snapback]
I felt like I wanted to post for all the lurkers out there that don't just come here to find leaks (and beg for them for that matter)...... although I've never posted, I come here daily for the comedy aspect as well as the educated posters.
Tonight on SOMB...
Sausage says poop,
Dr. Bill countsdown a list,
Pavs posts some of his music,
and Solace likes stuff!!!!
hahaha
urge26
Apr 30 2006, 06:15 PM
QUOTE(DrJimmy @ Apr 30 2006, 07:07 PM) [snapback]77366[/snapback]
QUOTE(urge26 @ Apr 30 2006, 06:58 PM) [snapback]77362[/snapback]
I felt like I wanted to post for all the lurkers out there that don't just come here to find leaks (and beg for them for that matter)...... although I've never posted, I come here daily for the comedy aspect as well as the educated posters.
wow, it's the lurker ambassador.
RLaidEPeas
Apr 30 2006, 06:16 PM
I found this site a few weeks ago. I just registered today. You gotta start sometime. I look forward to interacting and sharing my opinions.
Wilcoinator
Apr 30 2006, 06:17 PM
QUOTE(pinkerton @ Apr 30 2006, 05:37 PM) [snapback]77355[/snapback]
i'll send a link to a better quality rip of the new rchp album to anyone who pms me (as long as i recognize your name)
How much better does it sound? The one I have sounds pretty damn good...
robbie
Apr 30 2006, 06:18 PM
QUOTE(shimmy @ Apr 30 2006, 05:56 PM) [snapback]77255[/snapback]
good morning everyone.....figured I would have started some discussion since I put those up.
I fuckin love this album. I think if the whole album was 17 tracks and 80 minutes long then it would rival BSSM but there are so many good tracks on both disc's. Good stuff!!
charlie, title track and animal bar RULE!
I must say I'm pleasantly shocked at how good this is. still no BSSM though
urge26
Apr 30 2006, 06:19 PM
there is a high quality one posted on usenet...... I'm not feeling it so far, don't understand how this is better than there last few albums of crap.
RLaidEPeas
Apr 30 2006, 06:21 PM
I'm digging the title track. It has the same sort of vibe as the title track from Californication.
There had been alot of talk about the band going back to the earlier funky feel in alot of the songs, but i'm really preferring the ballads.
urge26
Apr 30 2006, 06:26 PM
I really like the title track too.
shampoosuicide
Apr 30 2006, 06:28 PM
Does anyone have the new taking back sunday?
i've heard so many good things that i have to listen at least once. Thanks
and sorry if i'm annoying you guys, i know i request too many.
RLaidEPeas
Apr 30 2006, 06:30 PM
For every good song, there seems to be alot of filler/b-side quality songs. Double albums are great when there is a conceptual need for them. Or to seperate a mood - like having the first disc rock out and the second disc be slow acoustic stuff. I can't help but think they could have dropped alot of these songs and just released a solid single disc. It just seems like there isn't really a flow. Just a collection of a bunch of different songs with alot of different moods.
robbie
Apr 30 2006, 06:31 PM
stolen from a link on Indie Surfer Blog
hereTaking Back Sunday
Rocks And Blows
Apr 30 2006, 06:36 PM
QUOTE(RLaidEPeas @ Apr 30 2006, 06:30 PM) [snapback]77381[/snapback]
Double albums are great when there is a conceptual need for them. Or to seperate a mood - like having the first disc rock out and the second disc be slow acoustic stuff.
The Foo Fighters did that on their last album and it sucked.
RLaidEPeas
Apr 30 2006, 06:39 PM
That is true. But did the Foo Fighters album suck because of the rock and acoustic disc format or did it suck because the songs just weren't very good?
I'm going with the latter.
Rocks And Blows
Apr 30 2006, 06:41 PM
QUOTE(RLaidEPeas @ Apr 30 2006, 06:39 PM) [snapback]77387[/snapback]
That is true. But did the Foo Fighters album suck because of the rock and acoustic disc format or did it suck because the songs just weren't very good?
I'm going with the latter.
I agree, the songs sucked
RLaidEPeas
Apr 30 2006, 06:45 PM
Nobody was more disappointed about that Foo Fighters album than me. I was looking really forward to it after reading Dave Grohl mention how the previous record wasn't very good, and he realized that, and that this was some of the best stuff the band had done since The Colour and the Shape.
It's really strange how the band was so much better when it was basically just Dave Grohl doing everything in the studio, and then having the band just to play the stuff live. But now that they are all involved with the songwriting and stuff, the band has gotten lame.
Rocks And Blows
Apr 30 2006, 06:48 PM
QUOTE(RLaidEPeas @ Apr 30 2006, 06:45 PM) [snapback]77391[/snapback]
Nobody was more disappointed about that Foo Fighters album than me. I was looking really forward to it after reading Dave Grohl mention how the previous record wasn't very good, and he realized that, and that this was some of the best stuff the band had done since The Colour and the Shape.
It's really strange how the band was so much better when it was basically just Dave Grohl doing everything in the studio, and then having the band just to play the stuff live. But now that they are all involved with the songwriting and stuff, the band has gotten lame.
I liked One By One alot, i thought TINLTL was awful, and I think Hawkins had some good stuff, but I saw them live and they phoned it in, I've pretty much given up on them.
shimmy
Apr 30 2006, 06:48 PM
QUOTE(urge26 @ Apr 30 2006, 04:19 PM) [snapback]77376[/snapback]
there is a high quality one posted on usenet....
what are we talkin' here?
urge26
Apr 30 2006, 06:52 PM
QUOTE(shimmy @ Apr 30 2006, 07:48 PM) [snapback]77394[/snapback]
QUOTE(urge26 @ Apr 30 2006, 04:19 PM) [snapback]77376[/snapback]
there is a high quality one posted on usenet....
what are we talkin' here?
320 Kbps I believe
RLaidEPeas
Apr 30 2006, 06:53 PM
How do we know it's not another transcode?
shimmy
Apr 30 2006, 06:54 PM
QUOTE(urge26 @ Apr 30 2006, 04:52 PM) [snapback]77396[/snapback]
320 Kbps I believe
damn dude get that and spread some love.
urge26
Apr 30 2006, 06:55 PM
no clue, sounds good to me..... can't bitch about a leak
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.