QUOTE(The Luscious Phil @ Dec 12 2007, 11:04 PM) [snapback]528716[/snapback]
I doubt this will get much response over night, but I am going to use my Borders 30% off coupon to pick up a book to read this break (after I finish
Persepolis, and
What is the What) And I am trying to choose between these two books:

or

thoughts? I think storywise I am more interested in Underworld, but it is a little long for a simple read over the break (especially because I asked fro the new Pynchon book for Xmas), but I am really interested in getting into Cormac, and feel that BM is his most well regarded book.
This post makes me love all that is Luscious Phil. Pynchon, McCarthy, Delillo? Hell Yes!
As for your question:
McCarthy's language can be very beautiful and epic (and often is) but perhaps not in the way you expect. His ability comes in his economy of language. He is somewhat laconic and tends to describe things very simply but with alarming accuracy. I find it to be a very appropriate strategy for his novels which tend to take place in bleak and desperate terrains.
Delillo is an entirely different animal. he tends to focus more on the interior of his characters. No matter how base or twisted his characters may seem to the outside world, there is always a complicated and reasonable interior.
McCarthy is plot and story. Delillo is character and philosophy.
Both are great. Choose wisely.