
Nicholson Baker - Human Smoke
Over the course of the last few years, there's been a fair bit of revisionist WWI/WWI and 20th Century History, which is the usual course in US historiography.
When I read the review of this book back in the winter, there was a brief interview with Baker, saying that as part of his
newspaper archiving efforts, he'd read a lot of material regarding the pacifist movement between the wars, and had been surprised to find that it was as strong as it was. People in the US and UK were locked up for sedition and "alien sympathies".
Baker started digging deeper, to any official sources he could find. Official, in this case, led to newspaper articles, press releases, declassified government documents, courtroom testimony, depositions, journals, military reports, speeches, etc. From this, Baker's culled a set of articles or article extracts that draw an arc of the world from about 1919 to December 31st, 1941. Baker leaves the articles alone for the most part (inserting editor's marks where terms or names aren't clear), and usually leaves it at that. What you get is a portrait that pushes the conventional view of the origins of WWII aside-- the US and the UK were spoiling for a fight as much as the Axis powers. Because of the strong isolationist movement in the US, FDR was less inclined to enter the war in the European theatre-- he was more interested in fighting in the Pacific, since we had colonies and bases to defend there. Churchill was forever chasing FDR, trying to persuade Roosevelt to enter the war. Lots of descriptions of bombing missions performed by the RAF (with American supplied bombers through Lend-Lease), and they're all fairly horrible.
It's an interesting approach, and Baker does a reasonably good job of connecting the dots, although it does feel like he's cherry-picked some stuff. He's got an extensive bibliography, though, so there's a lot more to read and research.
Speaking of which, this is on deck now:

Niall Ferguson - The War of the World.