QUOTE (The Luscious Phil @ Dec 30 2008, 09:08 PM)

QUOTE (brobee @ Dec 30 2008, 07:23 PM)

QUOTE (The Luscious Phil @ Dec 30 2008, 06:43 PM)


I am about 100 pages into 2666.
I don't know what to think about it, but I know that I am enjoying it as much, if not more than "The Savage Detecitves." (which is probably the best book I read since Flanagan's
Gould's Book of Fish ) Maybe that is because I now know how to read Bolano, or if his writing is that much better in this novel, either way, this man has become one of my favorite writers.
this book is epic in every way. it tries the patience, but it's also probably the easiest time i've had with bolano yet. and by easy, i mean readable and richly, tangibly rewarding. the first and last segments of the book are the best, but there's never a moment where you distrust where he is going with the story.
edit: and i gotta say, phil, my respect for you has skyrocketed as a result of the above post. i was talking about books over the weekend with a couple sharp friends (one of which is currently studying fiction) and neither had ever heard of bolano. it made me sad to think that most people, unless they follow new fiction closely, have any inkling about the man. he is a giant.
Odd, I think Bolano was pretty much one of the hottest and most discussed authors of the last few years. But that might just be because I do follow new fiction quite a bit, and some of my best friends were all about "The Savage Detectives," so maybe I felt like the book had more exposure than it really did.
I totally agree with you on the idea that this book (so far) is really readable. Whereas, I cannot think of a more trying section of literature than the middle part of "The Savage Detectives." It would be brilliant for a few pages, and then a little boring for the next few and so on. I think that was intended, but that doesn't mean I have to like it.
QUOTE (Ogawa @ Dec 30 2008, 08:39 PM)

Any Philip Roth recommendations? I've only read The Dying Animal (an odd place to start, I know). I recently received Portnoy's Complaint and American Pastoral for gifts. And I just purchased a copy of Sabbath's Theater. Should I start with any of those? Is there another one I should buy and read first?
I've only read "American Pastoral," and I think that it is worthy of all of the praise it has received. Totally fantastic book.
i made it about halfway through the savage detectives this past spring and i really liked parts, i went too slow and lost track of what i was reading exactly. bolano has the habit of introducing too many characters at once and just kinda letting you sink or swim with them. it's admirable, but makes for some rough patches of reading. my friends hadn't heard of him, largely because they're in school and don't do much non-required reading. still, no excuse considering his literary ubiquity for the past year and change.
as for roth, i'd start with portnoy (better than goodbye, columbus), move to american pastoral or any of that trilogy, read some of his lesser work, like the breast, to break the seriousness, move to operation shylock, which is, for me, roth's magnum opus, and then catch up on the rest. his past few have been inessential, but compulsively readable, some of his older work is trying, but rewarding. the cream of the crop, though, are portnoy, pastoral-human stain, shylock and sabbath.