MCF
Oct 30 2006, 11:12 AM
Does copyright law have to be re-evaluated in this new world of music swapping?
Angrimorfee
Oct 30 2006, 11:18 AM
MCF
Oct 30 2006, 11:25 AM
kalmia
Oct 30 2006, 11:47 AM
yes
Binko
Oct 30 2006, 12:00 PM
no
yancy
Oct 30 2006, 12:08 PM
maybe
biggie mcsmalls
Oct 30 2006, 12:11 PM
In some cases yes, most cases no,
My advice goes as follows,
Go home, brick yourself in,
Think about it properly, go back to the beginning.
norton
Oct 30 2006, 12:11 PM
The definitive answer is, "Ask CopyrightQ."
tjenz
Oct 30 2006, 12:20 PM
I don't know
b17yoe
Oct 30 2006, 12:25 PM
Who cares?
yancy
Oct 30 2006, 12:28 PM
REPLY HAZY, TRY AGAIN
HewlettsDaughter
Oct 30 2006, 12:30 PM
Potentially, yes
Sid Hartha
Oct 30 2006, 12:33 PM
yes and no
Mitchell
Oct 30 2006, 12:36 PM
yancy
Oct 30 2006, 12:38 PM
OUTLOOK NOT SO GOOD
scarymuppet
Oct 30 2006, 12:40 PM
Hey... oh wait... nevermind.
tjenz
Oct 30 2006, 12:54 PM
good thread
HewlettsDaughter
Oct 30 2006, 01:20 PM
it's a bit of a gray-area
MattDrufke
Oct 30 2006, 01:22 PM
Quite possibly.
Freddie Freelance
Oct 30 2006, 01:39 PM
Mr. Inches, it's not just music but all digitizable media: Images, Movies, Video, Software, Books, etc.
Microsoft used to charge by the CPU, now they've changed that to by the CPU core (due to the advent of multicore CPUs), and they're trying to change that to include Multiple System Images per Processor Core (due to Server Virtualization).
MCF
Oct 30 2006, 01:46 PM
QUOTE(Freddie Freelance @ Oct 30 2006, 12:39 PM) [snapback]231355[/snapback]
Mr. Inches, it's not just music but all digitizable media: Images, Movies, Video, Software, Books, etc.
Yes. That's what I meant. Thanks for the clarification.
Seamus
Oct 30 2006, 01:49 PM
QUOTE(Hewletts Daughter @ Oct 30 2006, 12:20 PM) [snapback]231341[/snapback]
it's a bit of a gray-area
How gray, charcoal? ©
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.