QUOTE(agrimorfee @ May 1 2007, 08:07 AM) [snapback]364343[/snapback]
QUOTE(caley @ Apr 30 2007, 05:55 PM) [snapback]364126[/snapback]

[ I've got to say, I prefrer the original, Charlie in this one was too damned perfect. At least Charlie in the first version, snuck in and tried that candy he wasn't supposed to, this Charlie did everything right, apologized, and was just too squeaky clean. ...Lastly, I liked the first Oompa Loompas better, they were much more terrifying.
Charlie was so perfect because that's how Roald Dahl's book had it. Stuart Gordon, the director of Willie Wonka, said that they purposely added the Slugworth candy plotline (and the fizzy lifting drinks) in order to give some dramatic arc to the overall story.
...It wouldn't be PC to make Oompa Loompas terrifying today!

The novel's original illustrations and descriptions depicts them as vaguely African jungle people.
Full story here.Boy, it turns out I don't remember the book much at all, lol. I know Dahl didn't like the original adaptation, so this probably would have jived with his vision much better, but I still prefer the original.
The Oompa Loompas debate is completely hilarious, as you have people using passages from a kid's novel to support theories of racism and slavery. I'd forgotten how silly university gets. But, I agree with you that Burton probably couldn't have had Oompa Loompas who were black and terrifying without a whole boatload of controversey.
QUOTE('artem')
meh
You didn't like PLF? I think it's actually my favourite Godard, though I couldn't begin to explain what is going on in it. I just found the dialogue and imagery, even if I didn't understand it, kind of easy to get absorbed in. And I love the final scene.