QUOTE(forgo @ Dec 8 2007, 04:37 PM) [snapback]524680[/snapback]
QUOTE(bleach @ Dec 8 2007, 02:20 PM) [snapback]524666[/snapback]
anyways, you and forgo are completely off base with tom cruise in magnolia. it really is his best performance.
it very well may be. i have no reason to disagree with you, actually. i just hate him, hes an awful overrated actor and him being in the film really took away from the whole.
Hee hee! Time for me to play the arsehole card....
Forgo - I absolutely agree with all of it. Even the Buscemi part (who is a criminally underrated performer, to be sure).
Bleach - Cruise has this unique quality: No matter what he does, he always looks like a 2-dimensional image cut from a
GQ Magazine ad. Honestly. And I think he knows it, too. It would certainly explain why he attempts to infuse his characters with so much energy... yet even his big [spoiler]breakdown[/spoiler] scene in
Magnolia was an eye-roller at best with me. Any number of other actors could have pulled off that role easily, so why oh why didn't he catch the groove? It's because he's so damn
obvious - he's trying so hard to convince us that he's
working his ass off on this movie... and that
he's really, really feeling it... and
can't you see what a great performance this is? (This happens in everything I see him do - I was furious that I allowed myself to give
Minority Report the 2+ hours it required to flub both story and performance).
What he needs is a director who understands this bizarre quality o' Tom's and use a Tarantino approach to photographing Cruise - ie: when a character is speaking, focus more on the reaction of the person their speaking to as opposed to shooting the facial expressions of the speaker. I might actually be sold on 'im as a performer if someone were to try that route. Hell, he might even win an Oscar with that approach.