Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Now Playing
Sound Opinions Message Board > Anything Goes > Et Cetera
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237
AFTERSHOCK
QUOTE (Magnus Malcolm @ Aug 31 2008, 03:46 PM) *

Videodrome: What to say about this one... Damn. Talk about a savagely critical film. I feel incredibly uneasy each and every time I watch it (which is rarely). Fucked up, maybe even by Cronenberg standards.

What do you all think is Cronenberg's most, well, fucked up movie? I haven't seen some of his early stuff, such as Shivers, so I probably am not the best to say.

Love me some Videodrome. Saw it at an early age, and it's probably responsible for some of my more bizarre personality kinks... And yes, yer totally OTM with the line "I feel incredibly uneasy each and every time I watch it..."

I think it's one of Cronenberg's best, although I haven't seen his entire body of work. My faves by him are Videodrome, Naked Lunch & the Dead Zone. Existenz is probably the weirdest film he's ever done, but I gotta admit it didn't grab me. In fact, he definitely recycled a few of his earlier works for that one.
wakingrufus
im unpinning all the now $(verb)ing threads due to clutter. they are easily searchable if you want them, or you can subscribe to the thread
theremin
QUOTE (Montana @ Aug 31 2008, 01:59 PM) *
QUOTE (theremin @ Aug 31 2008, 08:55 AM) *
where did you see it?

I want to see it.



I drove out to the Mininova Theater.


Weird, I hadn't seen it on the marquee at similar theaters. I guess I'll have to get out there.
kingsleadhat


Southland Tales: I liked it. I know it's a cliche for these love-it-or-hate-it movies, but this is really a case of the haters not getting the point. It was abundantly clear that it was supposed to be incoherent, silly, poorly-acted, poorly-written, etc. I can understand the argument of not wanting to see it because of that, but it still remained very watchable and original despite the "flaws." Also, kudos to Kelly for at least trying to comment on our fucked-up times, even if he did it clumsily.

wishbone
The Prestige



Two rival magicians try to out do each other, with tragic consequences. Excellent film.

Stars Hugh Jackman, Michael Caine, Christian Bale and Scarlett Johansson among others.

In the top 10 of imdb.com 's fantasy and sci-fri categories and #15 in the mystery category.


The Prestige trailer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgNVC6Hv4KE
Ogawa
QUOTE (cerebralcaustic @ Aug 31 2008, 09:52 PM) *
Southland Tales: I liked it. I know it's a cliche for these love-it-or-hate-it movies, but this is really a case of the haters not getting the point. It was abundantly clear that it was supposed to be incoherent, silly, poorly-acted, poorly-written, etc. I can understand the argument of not wanting to see it because of that, but it still remained very watchable and original despite the "flaws." Also, kudos to Kelly for at least trying to comment on our fucked-up times, even if he did it clumsily.

I understood what Kelly was doing just fine. And I still thought it was very bad, very tedious, and not at all original.

Lots of filmmakers comment on our times with good films. I don't know why Kelly deserves a cookie for commenting on our times with a bad one.

http://soundopinions.org/forum/index.php?s...78&st=6337#
kingsleadhat
QUOTE (Ogawa @ Aug 31 2008, 09:18 PM) *
Lots of filmmakers comment on our times with good films.

Like what? The only one that comes to mind is Children of Men.
Ogawa
QUOTE (cerebralcaustic @ Aug 31 2008, 10:59 PM) *
QUOTE (Ogawa @ Aug 31 2008, 09:18 PM) *
Lots of filmmakers comment on our times with good films.

Like what? The only one that comes to mind is Children of Men.

Any number of films, really, though my view of what constitutes such a film is fairly broad. No Country For Old Men, Spike Lee's work in 25th Hour and Inside Man (good films) and She Hate Me which, although a bad film, is far more overstuffed and incoherent and original than Southland Tales. Iñárritu's Babel, Lars Von Trier's recent films, Little Children, David O. Russell's films, Oliver Stone's films (not lately, of course), specifically Natural Born Killers, a film which is truly packed with ideas. Greengrass, Spielberg, Winterbottom.

I could go on and on. Commenting on the times isn't really a rare theme in Cinema. Some films are more obvious about it than others. David Lynch's Inland Empire is more surreal and nebulous in terms of intent, but no less a comment on the times than Southland Tales.

If you're talking about science fiction films that do so, then I'll concede there aren't very many nowadays. But in the past, Brazil and Strange Days have both commented on the times with a bit more honesty and complexity than Southland Tales.
stephen thomas erlewine
QUOTE (Ogawa @ Aug 31 2008, 11:25 PM) *
QUOTE (cerebralcaustic @ Aug 31 2008, 10:59 PM) *
QUOTE (Ogawa @ Aug 31 2008, 09:18 PM) *
Lots of filmmakers comment on our times with good films.

Like what? The only one that comes to mind is Children of Men.

Any number of films, really, though my view of what constitutes such a film is fairly broad. No Country For Old Men, Spike Lee's work in 25th Hour and Inside Man (good films) and She Hate Me which, although a bad film, is far more overstuffed and incoherent and original than Southland Tales. Iñárritu's Babel, Lars Von Trier's recent films, Little Children, David O. Russell's films, Oliver Stone's films (not lately, of course), specifically Natural Born Killers, a film which is truly packed with ideas. Greengrass, Spielberg, Winterbottom.

I could go on and on. Commenting on the times isn't really a rare theme in Cinema. Some films are more obvious about it than others. David Lynch's Inland Empire is more surreal and nebulous in terms of intent, but no less a comment on the times than Southland Tales.

If you're talking about science fiction films that do so, then I'll concede there aren't very many nowadays. But in the past, Brazil and Strange Days have both commented on the times with a bit more honesty and complexity than Southland Tales.


one thing southland tales has that those other films don't is authenticity. as in, the film is authentically plastic and junky, for a plastic, junky age.
undo
QUOTE (caley @ Aug 29 2008, 12:36 PM) *
My brother and I, a couple years back, rented and watched the entire Robotech: The Macross Saga which was awesome, and decided to do the same thing with Evangelion. But we only lasted a couple episodes b/c we both got sick of the lead kid's whining. Does he get any better?


This seems to be the most common criticism of the series, always struck me as odd since I don't think any of it was inappropriate given the circumstances. I suppose it depends a lot on what your expectations are going into it. For whatever it's worth he does get better, only to get much worse later on.
Ogawa
QUOTE (brobee @ Sep 1 2008, 12:21 AM) *
one thing southland tales has that those other films don't is authenticity. as in, the film is authentically plastic and junky, for a plastic, junky age.

Inland Empire has that digital look to it that is very much of the age. As well, Natural Born Killers very much imitated the media of the age.
stephen thomas erlewine
QUOTE (Ogawa @ Sep 1 2008, 12:32 AM) *
QUOTE (brobee @ Sep 1 2008, 12:21 AM) *
one thing southland tales has that those other films don't is authenticity. as in, the film is authentically plastic and junky, for a plastic, junky age.

Inland Empire has that digital look to it that is very much of the age. As well, Natural Born Killers very much imitated the media of the age.


southland tales is busy, obvious and ugly. inland empire is not. natural born killers on the other hand was very much a movie of its time, but not of ours.
Ogawa
QUOTE (brobee @ Sep 1 2008, 01:15 AM) *
QUOTE (Ogawa @ Sep 1 2008, 12:32 AM) *
QUOTE (brobee @ Sep 1 2008, 12:21 AM) *
one thing southland tales has that those other films don't is authenticity. as in, the film is authentically plastic and junky, for a plastic, junky age.

Inland Empire has that digital look to it that is very much of the age. As well, Natural Born Killers very much imitated the media of the age.

southland tales is busy, obvious and ugly. inland empire is not. natural born killers on the other hand was very much a movie of its time, but not of ours.

I concede the point.
stephen thomas erlewine
can we stop talking about southland tales, like forever. i don't want to keep disagreeing with you, ogawa. this thread's way more fun when we're all talking about stuff we love. or unanimously hate.
Ogawa
haha, no doubt. I declare a personal moratorium on Southland Tales discussion. I will henceforth bite my tongue when the film is mentioned, unless in the context of a larger discussion.
Montana
QUOTE (brobee @ Sep 1 2008, 12:30 AM) *
can we stop talking about southland tales, like forever. i don't want to keep disagreeing with you, ogawa. this thread's way more fun when we're all talking about stuff we love. or unanimously hate.



Yes. More talk on "The Objective" please.
Some Brilliant Bullsh*t
QUOTE (Ogawa @ Aug 31 2008, 10:25 PM) *
If you're talking about science fiction films that do so, then I'll concede there aren't very many nowadays. But in the past, Brazil and Strange Days have both commented on the times with a bit more honesty and complexity than Southland Tales.


OTM. One thing I find distressing about the science fiction films post- Star Wars is how few of them seem to have any sociopolitical content, esp when you consider that science fiction, as a literary genre, was almost always concerned with social/political/spiritual themes.
Ogawa
QUOTE (booradley'sboy @ Sep 1 2008, 01:43 AM) *
OTM. One thing I find distressing about the science fiction films post- Star Wars is how few of them seem to have any sociopolitical content, esp when you consider that science fiction, as a literary genre, was almost always concerned with social/political/spiritual themes.

Even though it sort of self-combusted in the last twenty minutes, Danny Boyle's Sunshine dealt with some really interesting spiritual and existential issues. I read some things last year that suggest Boyle and Garland disagreed about the direction of the film. Garland's screenplay apparently really played up the atheism vs. God aspect of the whole thing. There's something really strange and compelling about a dying sun/dying god and what that means in terms of spirituality.

The film is still really good, but Boyle directed it too much like an action picture.

The "Kaneda, what do you see?" scene is one of the greatest scenes of recent years. They really should've explored those themes more.

QUOTE (Montana @ Sep 1 2008, 01:41 AM) *
Yes. More talk on "The Objective" please.

This isn't on DVD yet, but I'll check it out when it is. I haven't seen any of his post-Blair Witch work, but I loved that film so it'll be interesting to see how his talent has evolved.
theremin
yeah, don't expect a lot of conversation about something that's only available on a leak.
caley
QUOTE (undo @ Aug 31 2008, 11:31 PM) *
QUOTE (caley @ Aug 29 2008, 12:36 PM) *
My brother and I, a couple years back, rented and watched the entire Robotech: The Macross Saga which was awesome, and decided to do the same thing with Evangelion. But we only lasted a couple episodes b/c we both got sick of the lead kid's whining. Does he get any better?


This seems to be the most common criticism of the series, always struck me as odd since I don't think any of it was inappropriate given the circumstances. I suppose it depends a lot on what your expectations are going into it. For whatever it's worth he does get better, only to get much worse later on.

Oh man...I think I probably would watch the series, if I owned it. But, for whatever reason, the idea of renting the discs individually and watching them never appealed to me. Has anybody else watched Robotech? Man, that is so weird and great. I especially like when the aliens kidnap the humans and try to get them to explain love and the big alien overlord says to the two fighter pilot dudes: "You two, kiss each other!" My brother just bought the whole set, I'm so gonna end up watching the entire thing.

QUOTE (Ogawa @ Sep 1 2008, 12:52 AM) *
QUOTE (booradley'sboy @ Sep 1 2008, 01:43 AM) *
OTM. One thing I find distressing about the science fiction films post- Star Wars is how few of them seem to have any sociopolitical content, esp when you consider that science fiction, as a literary genre, was almost always concerned with social/political/spiritual themes.

Even though it sort of self-combusted in the last twenty minutes, Danny Boyle's Sunshine dealt with some really interesting spiritual and existential issues. I read some things last year that suggest Boyle and Garland disagreed about the direction of the film. Garland's screenplay apparently really played up the atheism vs. God aspect of the whole thing. There's something really strange and compelling about a dying sun/dying god and what that means in terms of spirituality.

The film is still really good, but Boyle directed it too much like an action picture.

Yeah, I really loved it until it became like "28 Light Years Later".

QUOTE
The "Kaneda, what do you see?" scene is one of the greatest scenes of recent years. They really should've explored those themes more.

Agreed. That scene absolutely floored me on the big screen.


And everyone's gonna laugh at him.

Lars and the Real Girl: You know, for all my snark and love of many things cynical and nasty (Huge fan of Mr. Show and David Cross' live stuff, which is about as cynical as it gets), I'm really a firm believe in the human capacity for good. So, once in a while, it's really great to see a movie like this, a movie about people being good and kind to each other. I hate to describe it as a feel-good film, because that reminds me of Hallmark-type gooeyness, but this one does make you feel good. And everyone's so freakin' good in it, from Ryan Gosling on down to the extras in the waiting room. This premise, about a guy falling in love with a sex doll, had such a possibility to be a terrible screenplay and film, full of gross-out gags and embarassing situations, and instead, you get this amazing film about...goodness. It's a big testament to how good 2007 is that this ranked about #4 on my year-end list. I have a feeling it will inch its way up toward number one in the coming years.
Ogawa
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfDCvbEtxzY

So good. Love that music. Don't know why they never released a soundtrack.

Also, Cillian Murphy's spacesuit jump from the main ship to the bomb at the end was great. Wonderful music and perfect editing. The cut back to his "surface of the sun" dream is chilling.
Tony
QUOTE (booradley'sboy @ Sep 1 2008, 12:43 AM) *
QUOTE (Ogawa @ Aug 31 2008, 10:25 PM) *
If you're talking about science fiction films that do so, then I'll concede there aren't very many nowadays. But in the past, Brazil and Strange Days have both commented on the times with a bit more honesty and complexity than Southland Tales.


OTM. One thing I find distressing about the science fiction films post- Star Wars is how few of them seem to have any sociopolitical content, esp when you consider that science fiction, as a literary genre, was almost always concerned with social/political/spiritual themes.


Star Wars was a throwback to the SF of the 1920s-1930s.

Literary SF has generally gone...

20s and 30s: Adventure based
40s and 50s: Technology based
60s and 70s: Sociology based.
stephen thomas erlewine
sunshine was one of the best of the recent frustrating/imperfect films. on one hand, it was a totally dropped ball as a complete package, but the cast made the most of those characters, the visuals were among the best i've ever seen, and the movie was more unsettling than most these days (looking at you, the ruins).

anybody heard anything about boyle's new one, slumdog millionaires? it's starting to screen and word is mighty strong out of the gate. and the movie itself sounds more in line with millions, which for me is boyle's best film start to finish.
caley
QUOTE (brobee @ Sep 1 2008, 11:06 AM) *
anybody heard anything about boyle's new one, slumdog millionaires? it's starting to screen and word is mighty strong out of the gate. and the movie itself sounds more in line with millions, which for me is boyle's best film start to finish.

I hadn't but after looking it up, I want to now.

What I love about Danny Boyle is he does something different nearly every time out. Trainspotting, 28 Days Later, Millions, and Sunshine; that's a pretty diverse grouping of movies there.
stephen thomas erlewine
QUOTE (caley @ Sep 1 2008, 01:25 PM) *
QUOTE (brobee @ Sep 1 2008, 11:06 AM) *
anybody heard anything about boyle's new one, slumdog millionaires? it's starting to screen and word is mighty strong out of the gate. and the movie itself sounds more in line with millions, which for me is boyle's best film start to finish.

I hadn't but after looking it up, I want to now.

What I love about Danny Boyle is he does something different nearly every time out. Trainspotting, 28 Days Later, Millions, and Sunshine; that's a pretty diverse grouping of movies there.


what i prefer about boyle 2.0 is that he's making an effort to put a good amount of heart into his movies, without sacrificing the quality or even the pessimism of his stories. i mean, i love children of men, but there wasn't really a single character you can attach yourself to. in all of boyle's post-beach output, he really makes his characters likable, that way whether they get bitten by a speed zombie, get addicted to the sun, stumble across a million pounds, whatever, you're invested in them. very few other directors do this as well as him. i mean, i've enjoyed all of his films to some degree, but post-beach, he's really been bringing it.

this new movie sounds like cancer, were it in the hands of tom shadyac or someone of similar (non)talents. but with boyle at the helm, i can't think of a movie i'd rather go see this second.

i mean, not to ramble on, but millions was the best children's film since babe. and i'm not even sure if it was a kid's movie. there was so much going on there that could have been disastrous, but it came off as totally natural. i can't think of a movie that wielded its conscience like that movie did. bono and angelina can hold all the press conferences and photo ops they want, but that movie could do so much more to help, if only people would fucking watch it slash show it to their kids.
stephen thomas erlewine
http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117938135...d=2863&cs=1
Pavement Ist Rad


A great film.
velocity
QUOTE (undo @ Aug 31 2008, 11:00 AM) *

I despise Wal-Mart and found nothing to disagree with here. That said, what a horrible mess this film is. So many unnecessary talking heads, never establishing a scene before letting anyone launch into a rant. All the interviews are botched by horrible camerawork or distracting and pointless editing.

You can film ordinary people and let them start talking about something they're passionate about without turning in a mess like this. Take the Who Killed the Electric Car documentary from two years ago. Sit them down and set up some lights and heck, even coach them to get the best take if you need to (no idea if this was done but I don't see why it would necessarily be wrong in a film like this). Don't go out of your way to get pointless "casual" interviews where they're cooking dinner and the phone is ringing and the kids are crying. Don't include takes where the subject babbles and makes a fool of themselves. Don't wave the camera around so much, get a tripod if you can't focus on anyone while they're talking. Stop with the unnecessary editing during the interview scenes.

The attempt at Morgan Spurlock-like humor here throughout fails without a central narrator to tell where it's coming from. The silly graphics and spinning headlines feel so amateur and the montages do more to overwhelm than to educate. Cite where you're getting your statistics! After watching this I don't feel like I came away with one solid fact that I can share with anyone, just a series of emotional pleas.

I know this was straight to DVD so I shouldn't hold it up against theatrical documentaries, but it pales in comparison next to any episode of, say, Frontline. Big missed opportunity that could have been much more effective in the hands of a professional.



QUOTE (Ogawa @ Aug 31 2008, 11:11 AM) *
I haven't seen that film, but your description of it paints a dire picture. I think I'm pretty much tired of those kinds of documentaries in general. There were quite a few in 2004. The polemic, political, expose-type stuff is so boring and hardly ever done with any kind of genuine artistry. Even the better ones, like Electric Car or the Enron film, rarely go beyond the surface to any deeper human themes.

Give me Rouch, Wiseman, Herzog, or Longley. Not these pretenders.


That's all well and good and undo, of course, the story could've been more deftly/artistically presented. I dunno though--if someone has a big idea or an important message to get across, but doesn't have the wherewithal ($$, connections, time, whatever) to make an artistic film, is it better to do some damage control and just get the word out there, or wait until Herzog is free and interested? I go with the former. It wasn't unwatchable by any means, and it did illustrate the enormity of the problems it concerned itself with. The same arguments, pro and con, could be made re: An Inconvenient Truth.



Comcast has the 'director's cut' available on demand...it's been awhile since I saw the theatrical version, but this one struck me as virtually identical. I read that some of the shots are longer by a few seconds and imo, they needn't have bothered. Either way, it's still one of my guilty pleasures.

Also--



I liked this.
Angrimorfee
Dexter Season 1, borrowed from a friend. Up through episode 2, I don't care about the hard-ass Sgt. Doakes character one bit, but this is a lot of creepy fun...can hardly wait to see what further revelations are in store, in particular the flashbacks with "Dad".
held

'sixty-six'

had heard some great stuff about this but the end result while quality storytelling was not a lol experience but certainly an interesting portrayal if not impressive duplication of actual events.
worth renting but not spending $$ going to the theatre for.

my wife and I were the only ones in the theatre too and I haven't experienced that since I saw
'Millers Crossing'
hummingbird


Felt like watching it for the first time.
Ogawa
Which one you watching? The theatrical cut? The director's cut? The final cut?
Tracy Jacks
QUOTE (held @ Sep 2 2008, 03:04 PM) *
had heard some great stuff about this but the end result while quality storytelling was not a laugh out loud experience but certainly an interesting portrayal if not impressive duplication of actual events.
worth renting but not spending going to the theatre for.

I thought it was quite funny in spots, but went through a number of slow stretches. I'd agree that it's worth a rental/Netflix or if you find yourself at the theater with nothing else but Babylon AD and The House Bunny showing.
hummingbird
QUOTE (Ogawa @ Sep 2 2008, 04:55 PM) *
Which one you watching? The theatrical cut? The director's cut? The final cut?


The Final Cut. Also watched the very thorough Dangerous Days Documentary after, though I wasn't entirely focused for the 3 and a half hour run time.
Ogawa
QUOTE (hummingbird @ Sep 2 2008, 06:58 PM) *
QUOTE (Ogawa @ Sep 2 2008, 04:55 PM) *
Which one you watching? The theatrical cut? The director's cut? The final cut?

The Final Cut. Also watched the very thorough Dangerous Days Documentary after, though I wasn't entirely focused for the 3 and a half hour run time.

What'd you think of the film?
hummingbird
QUOTE (Ogawa @ Sep 2 2008, 06:05 PM) *
QUOTE (hummingbird @ Sep 2 2008, 06:58 PM) *
QUOTE (Ogawa @ Sep 2 2008, 04:55 PM) *
Which one you watching? The theatrical cut? The director's cut? The final cut?

The Final Cut. Also watched the very thorough Dangerous Days Documentary after, though I wasn't entirely focused for the 3 and a half hour run time.

What'd you think of the film?


It's definitely one of those films where it's hard to separate the reputation and status, in a way that seems different from some older classics, but I found myself really loving it. It was pretty different than I remembered. I hadn't seen it since college, and it was slower than I thought. Besides the obviously impressive set design, Rutger Hauer steals the show, and yet he's really not in a lot of the film. Watching the documentary immediately deepened my appreciation, but it's surprising how entertaining the film is with a semi-conventional videogame like plot (find and kill the four replcants) and yet it still somehow slips in depth with the philosophy.

Really a great film, regardless of what that unicorn actually means.
Pavement Ist Rad


I strongly disliked this film when I first saw it over four years ago. I thought it was unpleasant and could not be saved by the two or three genuinely funny jokes.

Over the years, I thought about it a lot and realized that I was a total pussy for ever doubting this film's brilliance. Finally saw it all the way through again, and yeah, easily one of the best of the decade.
caley

Why don't you put your fucking hair back on and come back, just come on back.

All the Real Girls: Hadn't watched this in a couple years, ever since I watched it like seven times in 2004. It really is staggeringly great. Just a beautiful, funny, sad, and hopeful film. One scene I never paid particular attention to before, but that caught my attention this time, is when small-town lothario Paul (Paul Schneider) and his mother (Patricia Clarkson) are discussing his moping around with a broken heart and she slaps him and sits there, despondent in her clown costume crying, and he sits in the background with smoke from his cigarette swirling around the room and it's such a gorgeous shot, amazing, really.
hummingbird
QUOTE (caley @ Sep 3 2008, 01:26 AM) *

Why don't you put your fucking hair back on and come back, just come on back.

All the Real Girls: Hadn't watched this in a couple years, ever since I watched it like seven times in 2004. It really is staggeringly great. Just a beautiful, funny, sad, and hopeful film. One scene I never paid particular attention to before, but that caught my attention this time, is when small-town lothario Paul (Paul Schneider) and his mother (Patricia Clarkson) are discussing his moping around with a broken heart and she slaps him and sits there, despondent in her clown costume crying, and he sits in the background with smoke from his cigarette swirling around the room and it's such a gorgeous shot, amazing, really.


One of my favorites. Staring at the poster across from the couch on my wall right now.

I hate to say it, but after Pineapple Express and news of the Suspiria remake, I think I am kind of sadly done with David Gordon Green.
held
QUOTE (hummingbird @ Sep 3 2008, 07:57 AM) *
news of the Suspiria remake, I think I am kind of sadly done with David Gordon Green.


NOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!! mad.gif


hummingbird
QUOTE (held @ Sep 3 2008, 09:32 AM) *
QUOTE (hummingbird @ Sep 3 2008, 07:57 AM) *
news of the Suspiria remake, I think I am kind of sadly done with David Gordon Green.


NOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!! mad.gif


Is this to there even being a Suspiria remake, or me feeling like David Gordon Green has no clue what he is doing with his career?
held
QUOTE (hummingbird @ Sep 3 2008, 09:40 AM) *
QUOTE (held @ Sep 3 2008, 09:32 AM) *
QUOTE (hummingbird @ Sep 3 2008, 07:57 AM) *
news of the Suspiria remake, I think I am kind of sadly done with David Gordon Green.


NOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!! mad.gif


Is this to there even being a Suspiria remake, or me feeling like David Gordon Green has no clue what he is doing with his career?

the suspiria part. Green's here nor there. He's gonna go the roure of Raimi and sell out-so be it. Just please leave the Argento films alone... Rumor's about Almodovar remakes have played on for years. Also a tragedy if it ever occurs.
Ogawa
QUOTE (hummingbird @ Sep 3 2008, 08:57 AM) *
I hate to say it, but after Pineapple Express and news of the Suspiria remake, I think I am kind of sadly done with David Gordon Green.

I think Green would like more freedom to make the films he really wants to make. Unfortunately, from what I understand, every single one of his films (Pineapple Express aside) has made less than a million dollars at the theater. So I can understand the recent commercial direction.

It's hard to complain about Express, though, considering Snow Angels only just came out earlier this year. I can imagine with the payday from Express, he'll likely make more personal films. A Suspiria remake would be unfortunate, but it shouldn't turn you off completely since he's clearly still dedicated to the smaller films.

Chances of him turning into a Sam Raimi are pretty much impossible, I think. His art is too niche. Raimi's on the other hand was tailor-made for commercial work.
Some Brilliant Bullsh*t
This question may belong more in Magnus' rolling thread, but I'll pose it here, anyway:

Do any of you ever get movie malaise?

I'm sure some of it, for me, is simply an economic issue, but I'm in a situation where I have permission to watch most anything I wish through ON DEMAND and not worry about the tab too much, and still, most days in the last two to three months I can't find anything I give a shit about. When I was a kid, I could suffer commercials and injudcious edits to watch movies on cable, simply because it was a movie.

These days, I have become more discriminating, at least about preferring to watch without inerruptions and edits, but it has also gotten harder and harder for me to find things I'll willingly endure. If I could afford either netflix or gettin' crazy at the local Blockbuster, I'd probably have a stack 20 high and three deep, but at least within my circumscribed parameters, I find little that excites me.

I miss the days when I'd watch almost anything, simply to be hypnotized/engaged for a couple hours. Curse aging and developing "standards."

Anyone?
Ogawa
I can't watch a movie if it's been tampered with in anyway. Commercials, edits, ratio adjustments, etc. It just feels like a waste of my time, knowing I'm not seeing the real thing.

Netflix allows for me to watch pretty much anything I please, but I burn and return and so I have stacks and stacks of unwatched DVDs around my TV. I certainly don't lack for interesting films to watch. It's more like I have way too many to watch. Knowing that I'd be happy watching just about anything causes a paralysis in me when attempting to make a selection.

As well, I don't watch more films because when I'm watching one I feel like I should be writing, or drawing/painting, or reading, or listening to music. Of course it's the same with all of those. If I'm listening to music I feel like I should be watching a film. If I'm reading a book, I get ideas for my writing and feel like I should be doing that instead.

I have this intense need to consume all these different artforms and at the same time I need to be producing my own art. I'm pulled in far too many directions.
Montana
QUOTE (booradley'sboy @ Sep 3 2008, 03:56 PM) *
This question may belong more in Magnus' rolling thread, but I'll pose it here, anyway:

Do any of you ever get movie malaise?

I'm sure some of it, for me, is simply an economic issue, but I'm in a situation where I have permission to watch most anything I wish through ON DEMAND and not worry about the tab too much, and still, most days in the last two to three months I can't find anything I give a shit about. When I was a kid, I could suffer commercials and injudcious edits to watch movies on cable, simply because it was a movie.

These days, I have become more discriminating, at least about preferring to watch without inerruptions and edits, but it has also gotten harder and harder for me to find things I'll willingly endure. If I could afford either netflix or gettin' crazy at the local Blockbuster, I'd probably have a stack 20 high and three deep, but at least within my circumscribed parameters, I find little that excites me.

I miss the days when I'd watch almost anything, simply to be hypnotized/engaged for a couple hours. Curse aging and developing "standards."

Anyone?


Exact opposite for me. As I get older, I stay away from all the dramas and "meaningful" movies I coveted as a teen and through my 20's. Now I just want to be entertained.
Ogawa
But the dramas and "meaningful" movies are entertaining!
Some Brilliant Bullsh*t
QUOTE (Montana @ Sep 3 2008, 04:03 PM) *
QUOTE (booradley'sboy @ Sep 3 2008, 03:56 PM) *
This question may belong more in Magnus' rolling thread, but I'll pose it here, anyway:

Do any of you ever get movie malaise?

I'm sure some of it, for me, is simply an economic issue, but I'm in a situation where I have permission to watch most anything I wish through ON DEMAND and not worry about the tab too much, and still, most days in the last two to three months I can't find anything I give a shit about. When I was a kid, I could suffer commercials and injudcious edits to watch movies on cable, simply because it was a movie.

These days, I have become more discriminating, at least about preferring to watch without inerruptions and edits, but it has also gotten harder and harder for me to find things I'll willingly endure. If I could afford either netflix or gettin' crazy at the local Blockbuster, I'd probably have a stack 20 high and three deep, but at least within my circumscribed parameters, I find little that excites me.

I miss the days when I'd watch almost anything, simply to be hypnotized/engaged for a couple hours. Curse aging and developing "standards."

Anyone?


Exact opposite for me. As I get older, I stay away from all the dramas and "meaningful" movies I coveted as a teen and through my 20's. Now I just want to be entertained.


I understand this, if I don't always agree. I find myself trolling through ON DEMAND's library, looking for that action/suspense/caper movie that will keep me entertained and yet not drive me insane with its willful stupidity. I still haven't watched There Will Be Blood, simply b/c I have to be in the right mood to get that involved. On the other hand, it took about no time to decide I should invest in Hit Man, which was, of course, awful.

So maybe it isn't "standards" - maybe I'm just lazy.
Montana
QUOTE (Ogawa @ Sep 3 2008, 04:04 PM) *
But the dramas and "meaningful" movies are entertaining!



IMHO very few are. "There Will Be Blood"? "No Country for Old Men"? Obviously entertaining. I have no problem with the top tier in this cateory. It's the also-rans that bore me to pieces. I'd much rather watch something like "The Ruins".
Angrimorfee
There are so many movies that are churned out from Hollywood (and Sundance, and overseas, etc.) that just meld into each other so much, I am very selective about what I will sit around for (be it a paid theater ticket, or a rental, or a borrowed DVD, or even a cheap purchase in the budget bin).

It's not a malaise, but rather a thoughtful selectiveness (combined with pressures of money and family obligations) that I suffer from. (when you become a parent, your movie watching situations are COMPLETELY changed...)
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.