Excellent show last night on the case of a Dover, PA school board trying to get intelligent design taught public shcool science class.
It was beautiful how the ID people painted themselves into corners with their psudeo-science.
The Christians repeatedly lying to try to get creationism taught in public schools. sweet irony.
I'm a monkey!
QUOTE
Leave it to the respected PBS science show "Nova" to put some common sense back into the often hysterical debate over whether intelligent design is science or religion - and remind us that Darwin's theory of evolution is a solid one that should be taught in science classes.
To understand these issues, all "Nova" producers really had to do was to re-enact portions of the precedent-setting trial, Kitzmiller v. Dover School District, the 2005 federal court case that held that intelligent design is not science and should not be taught in schools.
The two-hour special, "Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial" (8, tonight PBS stations), features re-creations of the case using actual transcripts and includes present-day interviews with a number of parents, teachers, town officials, scientists, and intelligent design advocates.
It amounts to a riveting film with plenty of real-life heroes and villains, along with a nuts-and-bolts science lesson on what Darwin's theory says and what it doesn't.
In 2004, the Dover, Pa., school board ordered science teachers to read a statement to high school biology students suggesting intelligent design is a legitimate alternative to the theory of evolution.
Intelligent design holds that life is too complex to have evolved naturally over time and therefore must have been designed by an intelligent agent. Dover's teachers refused to comply and parents opposed to this filed a federal lawsuit saying the statement violated the separation of church and state.
For U.S. District Court Judge John E. Jones III, a conservative Bush appointee, the issue wasn't to hold another Scopes Monkey trial. That issue was long ago settled by federal courts that have held teaching the Biblical account of creation in public schools amounts to an establishment of religion and violates the First Amendment.
For Jones the issue was: Is intelligent design simply creationism? The parents and teachers argued it was a thinly veiled tactic to teach the Bible in schools as science.
Jones decided for the plaintiffs writing that intelligent design "cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents."
How he reached that conclusion is what makes the film such compelling viewing, dramatized by the court re-enactments. There was even a "smoking gun" that plaintiff's attorneys uncovered during the trial that clinched their case. It makes for an ending twist as good as any scripted drama show. The piece does take some detours to revisit the theory of evolution - reminding viewers that, "it is one of the best-tested and most thoroughly confirmed theories in the history of science."
The Dover case, not surprisingly, tore apart the community. And this film doesn't ignore the personal drama profiling and bringing to life many of the major community politicians, parents and teachers making it more than a dry courtroom and scientific lecture.